Quote from Paulds11:
Humpy, no name calling on my side if thats what you mean.. I am rather Goading (unsuccessfully & perhaps ill considered I will admit.. apologies everyone) a response from Hershy. I pm'd him twice.. nothing... i left response.... nothing...even allowed for his assumptions.... nothing..
Hopefully everything ok and hes busy at the mo..especially as the Dow just dropped 200 points so I can hear on the news (damn hurry up and finish opening my new account please GNI!!!)
But why write such a thing and not expect a response?....unless your objective is to educate and not debate.... which raises serious questions does it not?...... hmmm .. I have a feeling we will not get a response but lets just wait for now....
I am keen to know more and go deeper.. to find out how he reconciles that without any anticipation or prediction... Personally Im sceptical or as is probably the case.. thier is simply misunderstanding over simple semantics with regard to a definition of "Prediction" and / or "anticipation"....
cmon Jack.... spread your beans please....
I wrote what I wrote to be helpful.
Right now I am culling through over 10,000 pages to build piles...five piles. Perhaps they will be helpful in the future for those who wish to manually trade somewhere.
It is clear that the market does not jump around.
It is also clear that the movement of the market operating point is a transition through multi-dimensioned space.
Once it becomes clear to a person how that path is determined by using, more or less a counter intuitive rationale, he is able to very clearly anticipate from this ordered and scientifically based proven null hypothesis what is what right down to the tick level.
Just so everyone has it straight, observations of the market are not what makes it so.
Now, 2007 is coming to a close and a period of contribution has been completed for putting PVT and SCT together in the journals in a step by step manual way. You will find it compares favorably with what else there is to chose from as one of many successful approaches.
Shooting holes in things is a common enterprise. I have chosen to not fill in the details that have been missed by those who do this. The reason is that their basic orientation to making money is not an orientation that leads to success, so I cannot help them in any way.
I can't help whiners either. Whining has no possitive orientation to being successful. Children cease whining at about 4 years old, usually.
Taking sufficient binary sets of data, repeatedly and following a routine of monitoring, analysis, decision making, and taking timely action is the definition of anticipation; it also coincides with front running the players in the game.
At this point it is best for me to kind of retire from most threads and, perhaps, just help occasionally to do my part in winding down the journals as 2007 comes to an end.
The conventional orthodoxy engenders to all who use it: fear, anxiety and anger, ultimately. For 50 years, I chose another path and paradigm. I passed it forward and people who decide to use it as they wish and they, in turn, pass it forward to others. That is going to continue.
It is unbelievable and astonishing to those who do not understand it or do not use it. That is their choice.
Choice has consequences, especially in the conventional orthodoxy which had an over 90% mortality rate. The many successful conventional orthodoxy methods and those methods outside of that box account for those who survive. Most people are so far gone that they cannot switch to anything else to survive in any paradigm.
Most popular press journalists and the contemporary writers carry forth the conventional orthodoxy. This is the contemporary basis that you use to judge PVT and SCT and me as an amateur trader. So I am unbelievable and astonishing. I use what the market offers as a standard and I judge myself to be doing a good job and I judge the conventional orthodoxy to be believably poor and I am astonished that it is so poor in performance.
I feel ET has a lot of forums and their threads cover the topics of trading. The redundancy is there as well. It is evident that there is a membership cycling going on. Some people come and go as they fail; others come and go as they see that a cycle of information exchange or learning has been completed. In trading, one cannot always learn. That is most often precluded as a consequence of prior choices. It is possible to learn to apply new support services to trading if the trading is successful. Successful traders can continue to learn and unsuccessful traders cannot continue to learn.
I have long been associated with the scientific community where often people cooperate to move forward the science of things. Certainly, where profits are concerned, cards are often held close and leapfrogging occurs. ET was different for me for the most part.
The fear, anxiety and anger, a consequence of the conventional orthodoxy, RULES. Sharing support, comfort and confidence is not on the table here in ET except in a few journals. The PVT and SCT journals will be available in the future and many contributors have been very helpful towards getting the working issues on the table so they can be iteratively refined.
It is really fun to make a lot more money than you need all the time. Deciding to do it, only takes a second. BE DO HAVE.
I think I have addressed the questions at this point. Thank you for reading my stuff over the years.