This isn't really a comment toward any specific post on this thread, rather its a general observation that in my experience you get what you pay for in this business most of the time.
It should hardly be suprising why a guy still paying 1/2-3/4 of a cent per share using one monitor, mediocre software, briefing.com for news and a DSL can't seem to make it.
Nobody could win car races consistently with a beatup ford/chevy when your going against formula 1's.
Yeah his expenses are next to nothing, but usually its because he's not making jack. His trading is a function in a lot of ways of what tools he does have. If I've got that setup above....I'm probably stuck swing trading or taking a longer time horizon on most of my trades cause my news is stale, my quotes are probably behind a thousand other guys with better connectivity, and I"m missing opportunities left and right because I don't have enough screen realestate.
Now compare that above a guy spending 2-3 grand a month.
His setup might be a t-1, quad monitors, he paying 1/3 of a cent per share or less, utilizes 2-3 software packages, he's automated some stuff, maybe paid a programmer a few grand if he can't do it, for news he's next to a bloomberg monitor or kicks down 2-3 hundred for wallstreet source , and a 50 dollar a month spoos squawk box blaring all day. He shells out a couple hundred more a month for 10-15 conversion so he can always get short a basket of stocks if need be.
Is he throwing money away? Not if Bloomberg throws up an FDA approval headline and he's able to grab the first 5K shares on the offer after the stock has already lifted 30 cents but before its lifted 3 bucks when briefing.com reports it. etc, etc.
For the most part traders aren't throwing away money for stuff they don't need. The first thing almost every sucessful trader does as they accumulate capital is upgrade their setup.
Traders know what makes them money. I've tried about everything. The most expensive tools usually pay for themselves pretty quick if you know how to utilize them.
Yeah the guy with a 10K Etrade account is going to get much out of paying 1750 a month for bloomberg but some guys sure as hell do.
It should hardly be suprising why a guy still paying 1/2-3/4 of a cent per share using one monitor, mediocre software, briefing.com for news and a DSL can't seem to make it.
Nobody could win car races consistently with a beatup ford/chevy when your going against formula 1's.
Yeah his expenses are next to nothing, but usually its because he's not making jack. His trading is a function in a lot of ways of what tools he does have. If I've got that setup above....I'm probably stuck swing trading or taking a longer time horizon on most of my trades cause my news is stale, my quotes are probably behind a thousand other guys with better connectivity, and I"m missing opportunities left and right because I don't have enough screen realestate.
Now compare that above a guy spending 2-3 grand a month.
His setup might be a t-1, quad monitors, he paying 1/3 of a cent per share or less, utilizes 2-3 software packages, he's automated some stuff, maybe paid a programmer a few grand if he can't do it, for news he's next to a bloomberg monitor or kicks down 2-3 hundred for wallstreet source , and a 50 dollar a month spoos squawk box blaring all day. He shells out a couple hundred more a month for 10-15 conversion so he can always get short a basket of stocks if need be.
Is he throwing money away? Not if Bloomberg throws up an FDA approval headline and he's able to grab the first 5K shares on the offer after the stock has already lifted 30 cents but before its lifted 3 bucks when briefing.com reports it. etc, etc.
For the most part traders aren't throwing away money for stuff they don't need. The first thing almost every sucessful trader does as they accumulate capital is upgrade their setup.
Traders know what makes them money. I've tried about everything. The most expensive tools usually pay for themselves pretty quick if you know how to utilize them.
Yeah the guy with a 10K Etrade account is going to get much out of paying 1750 a month for bloomberg but some guys sure as hell do.
