Quote from Trader666:
Grob109,
Your demented Grobian drivel reminds me of the writings of a paranoid schizophrenic. I hope you're well.
Why did you post that attachment? Are you saying it's somehow useful?
Here's an excerpt: "The trader connects to the internet through his data provider. This is also done on a contractual basis and represents an ongoing expense. Attendant to this he may use internet consultant services for specific trading projects. "
Compare that to Curtis Faith's Turtle Trading Rules. Do you see and understand the difference?
Yes it is useful.
A trader goes through an iterative refinement of his skills, knowledge which he gains, primarily through experience.
Becoming wealthy happens at differing rates for different people.
An appendix found in the same handout mentioned previously defines 8 different themes and categories of how and where improvement takes place.
Each of these impacts a persons effectiveness and efficiency. The scope and bounds of each includes the financial impact that each makes. A first order measure is that a doubling can result from each.
As you read through each thing I post for the benefit of anyone, you get to see and conclude that this stuff is not your cup of tea because of a variety of reasons that you go through the process of choosing. Currently, you are using an experiment as the basis of your comparisons. I am not. My approach is a longer duration one and one based upon a process of learning from the market and sharing responsibilities with the market. It is not an experiment per se. Currently my emphasis is on idiot proofing an approach so it can be adopted and used by a remote audience.
I feel that the more people who consider the substantive content and the multimedia delivery system, the better all issues related to transference can be handled.
you ask some questions that are important to you. To whit:
1. Why did you post that attachment?
It was a response to the faults you found in my post to cicsman. You suggested that I did not support my views with any specific help. You also made a couple of comments on my character and my behavior.
So I responded with substantive content in the form of an outline to scope and bound the plan opportunity cicsman is currently facing or not facing. Within the outline there is also a content description which, now, you are presenting abstracts that catch your attention for your reasons.
2. Are you saying it's somehow useful?
Often it is difficult to understand the utility of something if it is not clear to the person encountering it. For you, that is a consideration that is best for you to make. You have made it and it fails to pass your examination for reasons that work for you.
Because I adapted the plan from a common standard business plan organization, I feel that most people can make use of it as a common standard of comparison. My audience is not, however, most people. I work with a self-selecting group that makes it through a filtering process. The filtering process is designed and works to eliminate 4 out of 5 persons according to the record and polls on the subject done by others than myself. There is a good correlation among users that is very similar to the filtering results.
The "somehow" of the attachment is that it is a receptor of the person's personal situation, condition and circumstances. It turns out to produce a unique documentation that is comprehensive and specifically useful to the person who creates it. After a few hundred were created it became apparent that it is a supportive thing for making money for a family. No turtle type plans ever have appeared. All the plans turn out to be filled with the content necessary to impart to others and, more importantly, to guide the process of making money for the family in one or two particular ways throughout a skill development process.
3. Do you see and understand the difference? I'll pass on this since it does not hold my interest. I am sure others can discuss this with you if they so desire. Good luck in furthering this concern of yours. I have a comprehensive inclusive focus; you may find that a narrow approach is less productive.
Attached please find a draft of the 8 doublings.