Interpretations of the price are the same as price but different view on it. There is nothing wrong with them. The problem is how you use them.Quote from oddiduro:
All indicators are some sort of interpretation of price. Usually it is significantly delayed.
Why not just trade price and price alone?
Best Regards
Oddi
"price and price alone" is noisy. However you want to define "noise", it's real and it's at best a nuisance in price. If you have a "calibrated eyeball" that can see through the noise, i.e., if you are an expert chart reader, then congratulations. Not everybody has that talent, or that hard-earned skill, or whatever it is. Indicators cut through the learning curve, and some are better than others. I'm not going to invite another argument over which percentage are useful and which aren't. It doesn't matter. The bottom line is: well-designed indicators will decrease noise without losing lots of signal and therefore perform the task that a "calibrated eyeball" will perform. "zerolag" isn't even a secret anymore; look it up.Quote from oddiduro:
All indicators are some sort of interpretation of price. Usually it is significantly delayed.
Why not just trade price and price alone?
Best Regards
Oddi

Quote from tradersaavy:
Some people fish with depth finders and others go with what they have learned.
Indicators can assist to see price action that one may not be trained to see, yet, with the naked eye.
If it helps, by all means use it !
Quote from oddiduro:
All indicators are some sort of interpretation of price. Usually it is significantly delayed.
Why not just trade price and price alone?
Best Regards
Oddi
Quote from BSAM:
But Saavy, the so-called crutch is what prevents people from learning quicker how to really trade, IMHO. I think indicators (usually) serve more to muddy the vision, rather than provide clarity.
Quote from oddiduro:
Why not just trade price and price alone?