Why Malcolm Gladwell is right - Even though John Paulson did a good thing

[Frederick Foresight]

...As for snark...It's sarcastic commentary sprinkled in a debate/argument in order to score perceived (but imaginary) points. It inflames the discussion, degrades the quality and overall brings on a flame war. It is very possible to have a disagreement without snark.

I know, it's from that "Fringe" website/blog with no credibility they call Reuters, but...

But if the democrats put a white man forth as their nominee, he'll have to stand on his merits. They won't be able to play the race or gender card.

And that's just from this morning. I could go on, but what would be the point? Sure, we all do it from time to time; some more than others. But you carry an extra supply of hypocrisy with you for emergencies.