interesting topic, here are a few thoughts - first most "traders" are really just losing gamblers. I think women are generally much more cautious and therefore never start in the field. Also as mentioned by others, they are less likely to be exposed to trading in the first place.
Still, you'd think there would be a few more women traders at the top if both sexes had equal ability. Call me sexist, but I think women tend to be a little weaker in logic and have less patience for obsessive research and therefore are not as skilled at most types of trading. On the other hand, I know women who are quite good at market timing because they are well networked and have a natural sense of the rhythm of the markets and are more detached from the ego driven win/lose mentality.
Now if you really want a risque thread - why do various ethnicities appear more and less often among the top traders?
Still, you'd think there would be a few more women traders at the top if both sexes had equal ability. Call me sexist, but I think women tend to be a little weaker in logic and have less patience for obsessive research and therefore are not as skilled at most types of trading. On the other hand, I know women who are quite good at market timing because they are well networked and have a natural sense of the rhythm of the markets and are more detached from the ego driven win/lose mentality.
Now if you really want a risque thread - why do various ethnicities appear more and less often among the top traders?