Why isn't underwear free?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/EV4N2dk0cMk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

And obamacare requires underwear checks.
 
Quote from Mercor:

Its covered under Obamacare.

perhaps incontinence underwear are covered.
it might be useful for some traders whose positions are too leveraged.

now address the issue of free in a serious way.
 
Quote from DT-waw:

Up to about 70 billion world population everything could be free, but people prefer money over quality of life.

which jesus predicted.

Why underwear is not free?
Because hemp is illegal.
You can make the BEST fabric out of hemp. Far better and cheaper than cotton.

Hemp can be grown almost everywhere on the globe. does not need Monsanto products to be healthy.
Hemp oil is one of the most potent anticancer substances.

Get this- western world does NOT want to be happy, free, abundant.
In their sick brains best interest is to make everything as expensive as possible.
Luxury products being a prime example. its a new religion and new Gods for low melanin people. $30,000 watch, $50k bags, $1000 gbp cardigans
By the time I got to your fifth line, your creditability crashed faster than Charlie Sheen on stage.
 
Quote from zdreg:

food?
productivity of farmers has increased X times. if not for the polices of governments there would be nearly zero hunger in the world.

Watch food prices when oil goes up. See what I mean?
 
Quote from nitro:

I am confused by the idea of economic progress. I check the price of underwear at WMT:


Since were discussing the cosmos, I'm sitting here with the intraday holy grail. Now that I have this machine cranking out money, what do I do with the money.

So I thought I would support my community and open a restaurant giving free food and creating a few jobs. Turns out that it destroyed jobs, sucked the life outta wallstreet, etc, etc.

I can dream, can't I? Sorry man, gonna have to charge for the underwear.
 
Quote from nutmeg:

Boys and Girls Underwear 49 cents. 1935


---------------------


What cost $.49 in 1935 would cost $7.70 in 2010.
Also, if you were to buy exactly the same products in 2010 and 1935,
they would cost you $.49 and $0.03 respectively.

Priced in silver it would be even higher. 1 oz of silver in 1935 was about $1, so .49 would be about half an ounce. At todays price of $29 per oz, underwear would cost $14.21
 
Quote from nitro:

I am confused by the idea of economic progress. I check the price of underwear at WMT:

http://www.walmart.com/cp/Underwear-Socks/163866

So you can get a pair of underwear for about $13.50 / 4 = $3.75 per underwear. I wish I knew what the price of underwear was say in 1930 adjusted for wage inflation, and the price of cotton (do we need to include the price of oil to transport it?).

If machines make these things, and all of this stuff is outsourced to places that have very low wages, why isn't underwear close to free, or at least cheaper than it was in 1930?

Finite natural resources is the biggest ally of inflation.
If you feel that the price of underwear is prohibitively expensive, then you may wish to consider a time sharing arrangement with some like-minded people. I'm sure they'll be able to find a spot for you.
 
Back
Top