Why isn't Trump investigating Epstein's suspicious 'suicide'?

maximumpossiblesuffering said:
Well Rome had its circuses before its fall and the US has its political shows (Formally known as news) that could be considered circuses. Playing another devils advocate here, the Liberal Media reported a couple of events about a year ago that would have been quite damaging for Trump politically. However, there was not a peep of commentary by the media or here on ET on these events. I don’t feel compelled to dig them up right now, but did wonder at the time if we, the people, are being played by both sides.
More...
Of course we're being played by both sides, it's a game of distraction. Look over here at this silly meaningless shit while the real crimes go on elsewhere. The government is corrupt, not the R government, not the D government, the entire government, and their media and entertainment partners in crime do their part with the distractions.
 
exGOPer said:
Why don't you post these stats with sources?

Poor Trump, he only partied with pedophiles, mafia, Arabs and Russians, he never had time for anything else.
More...

Create your own statistics. That way they would have more credibility with you.

An interesting idea would be to use a computer to do a word count and ranking of the most common subject and adjectives used by politicians. My bet is the results would be embarrassing for the Democrats. I wonder how Trump would fair?
 
maximumpossiblesuffering said:
Create your own statistics. That way they would have more credibility with you.

An interesting idea would be to use a computer to do a word count and ranking of the most common subject and adjectives used by politicians. My bet is the results would be embarrassing for the Democrats. I wonder how Trump would fair?
More...

Will that word count include 'grab them by the pussy' 'epstein best friend' 'will date daughter' or 'mexico pay for wall'?
 
zgdeg252.png
 
For what it's worth, Trump has very clearly said to look into Epsteins fuck island. Not sure why this isn't more widely reported.

Oh wait, I know.
 
maximumpossiblesuffering said:
Isn’t there evidence that shows proven philanderer Bill Clinton was a frequent traveller on the Lolita Express to Epstein’s Island? From what I’ve heard, a lot of “fun” took place on on the plane itself.

At this point, like with what happened to the two prostitutes who had dirt on a massive number of DC politicians and also committed “Suicide”, what happened to the evidence?

If Trump was involved with sex with a minor, he should cut a deal with Barr and go after all the other DC politician sex offenders, including Democrats and Republicans. After all, Trump knows whether he had sex with Epstein’s “Friends” or not. Trump knows evidence of such will be released by the Democratic prosecutors at the perfect time as well. For that matter, Bill Clinton should be cut a deal for his testimony. I’m sure he would fear for his life as Epstein’s death shows they can get to you wherever you are. The question is, could Bill be convinced to be a hero for the “Greater good”? Back to reality, it is disingenuous of you to try to make a political point where the New York Democratic prosecutors holding the video evidence of politicians having sex with minors are not going to release anything that will hurt their party. Selective releasing of evidence would ultimately result in obstruction charges against these New York Prosecutors if Trump or another Republican were to still have Presidential power.

The next question is why did a CIA operative, Epstein, felt compelled to “Recruit” underage runaways, “Introduce” them to politicians, and video tape their “Interaction” with them? Was this an effort by a small entity to gain effective political control of the US Government through blackmail? Since this was a CIA operation, does it not imply that CIA’s leadership was involved? What prominent CIA director who had well established political interests could it have been?

Does not the death rate of Bill Clinton’s political opponents far exceeds normal statistical expectations? Don’t get me wrong, I don’t see Bill Clinton as a murderer. Political murders in the US are committed either by those who have strong interests US politics and who are also connected to the intelligence community, law enforcement, or the military in some way. Is it not possible the same entity that authorized the Epstein operation is also involved in political murders in the US that may include John Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr? That may include several prominent, very Liberal, but incorruptible, Senators in plane crashes while running for reelection?

Know who your friends are. Trump, for all his issues is a friend. The entity who is attempting to gain complete control over the US Political system and media is not.

So yes, let’s fast track the Epstein investigation and expose the deep state. Together.
More...

The death of Jeffrey Epstein is to shut him down and destroy evidence as top Democrats and others in top officials including, other countries were the supposed perpetrators for the victims that came out. Now, there are reports that Jeffrey Epstein's island has been scrubbed clean. Most of the evidence probably, destroyed permanently and any witnesses might suddenly, commit suicide or find themselves murdered by criminals out of nowhere. Add to that the deep state operatives and you would have a hard time proving anything! If they can murder President John F. Kennedy in cold blood in a very brazen fashion, they can pretty much kill anyone.
 
smallfil said:
The death of Jeffrey Epstein is to shut him down and destroy evidence as top Democrats and others in top officials including, other countries were the supposed perpetrators for the victims that came out. Now, there are reports that Jeffrey Epstein's island has been scrubbed clean. Most of the evidence probably, destroyed permanently and any witnesses might suddenly, commit suicide or find themselves murdered by criminals out of nowhere. Add to that the deep state operatives and you would have a hard time proving anything! If they can murder President John F. Kennedy in cold blood in a very brazen fashion, they can pretty much kill anyone.
More...

They murdered more than John Kennedy. Many men of the Kennedy family died by murder or unusual circumstances such as a plane crash. So one political family was decimated and another prominent political family was left untouched.

In time, artificial intelligence will likely make some interesting connections between significant events and political power structures. Political interest plus extreme ideology plus access to “resources” plus prior polarizing events may create a way to predict futures events based on well defined conditions. Eventually, we may be able to backtest, say from 1968, these defined conditions and be able to reach a prediction of future events from that point in time with greater than 95% probability.

Over the years, the assassin tool of choice has moved from guns to aircraft. If you were a particularly effective and incorruptible politician, your odds of dying in a plane crash were better than even. I’m not even including the possibility of politically convenient, medically related deaths such as induced brain cancer and heart attacks. The vast majority of those killed were Democrats. It is ironic that Democrats are attacking Trump as Trump is probably our only chance to shed light on these crimes that changed the geopolitical landscape for many decades.

It seems to me the Democrats and Republicans are being played by a outside entity. This entity has the resources to strategically offer political carrots to various leaders in exchange for the furtherance of their obscured agenda.

Until members of both parties figure this out, we will continue to be played against each other to our detriment.

Then again, there is the argument the intellectually fittest should be running things and that we all should be grateful they still have a use for us.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top