Why is this George Stephanopoulos hosting town halls for Joe Biden?

Try harder wildkaren

A jury last May in the second case awarded Carroll $5 million in damages after finding Trump liable for sexual abusing and defaming her.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/11/tru...-as-he-appeals-rape-defamation-penalties.html

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

Family values Conservatives so desperate to defend rapists.
Dude... either you're real stupid, or you're a paid troll.

He was NEVER convicted of rape.

Quit with the lies already. I'm not even a lawyer, but there is a huge difference between the burden of proof in a civil trial vs a criminal trial. And without even looking, at worst in the civil trial he was found guilty of battery.

The more you talk... the more stupid you sound.
~case closed.

EDIT:
Here stupid one.... read the last line:

Donald Trump Sexually Abused and Defamed E. Jean Carroll, Jury Finds
Video

09trump-carroll-verdict-pinned-ledeall-klpc-videoSixteenByNine3000.jpg



The former writer left the Manhattan courthouse smiling after a jury found that Donald Trump had sexually abused and defamed her. Mr. Trump’s lawyer said he intended to appeal.CreditCredit...Brittainy Newman for The New York Times
A Manhattan jury on Tuesday found former President Donald J. Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll and awarded her $5 million in damages. More than a dozen women have accused Mr. Trump of sexual misconduct over the years, but this is the only allegation to be affirmed by a jury.

In the civil case, the federal jury of six men and three women found that Ms. Carroll, 79, a former magazine writer, had sufficiently proved that Mr. Trump sexually abused her nearly 30 years ago in a dressing room of the Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan. The jury did not, however, find he had raped her, as she had long claimed.

--------------------

Do you ever get sick of being proven wrong time and time again?

--->"Dumb like a stump."~adc

Here it comes... "waaa waaa waaa.... Van is off topic again"
Yeah right. Grow up and get a brain you idiot. And then use it.:rolleyes:
 
Try harder wildkaren

A jury last May in the second case awarded Carroll $5 million in damages after finding Trump liable for sexual abusing and defaming her.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/11/tru...-as-he-appeals-rape-defamation-penalties.html

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

Family values Conservatives so desperate to defend rapists.
Read that last line in the above post again, I put it in boldface for the stupid among us.... courtesy of the NYT.
~case closed
 
Dude... either you're real stupid, or you're a paid troll.

He was NEVER convicted of rape.

Quit with the lies already. I'm not even a lawyer, but there is a huge difference between the burden of proof in a civil trial vs a criminal trial. And without even looking, at worst in the civil trial he was found guilty of battery.

The more you talk... the more stupid you sound.
~case closed.

EDIT:
Here stupid one.... read the last line:

Donald Trump Sexually Abused and Defamed E. Jean Carroll, Jury Finds
Video

09trump-carroll-verdict-pinned-ledeall-klpc-videoSixteenByNine3000.jpg



The former writer left the Manhattan courthouse smiling after a jury found that Donald Trump had sexually abused and defamed her. Mr. Trump’s lawyer said he intended to appeal.CreditCredit...Brittainy Newman for The New York Times
A Manhattan jury on Tuesday found former President Donald J. Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll and awarded her $5 million in damages. More than a dozen women have accused Mr. Trump of sexual misconduct over the years, but this is the only allegation to be affirmed by a jury.

In the civil case, the federal jury of six men and three women found that Ms. Carroll, 79, a former magazine writer, had sufficiently proved that Mr. Trump sexually abused her nearly 30 years ago in a dressing room of the Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan. The jury did not, however, find he had raped her, as she had long claimed.

--------------------

Do you ever get sick of being proven wrong time and time again?

--->"Dumb like a stump."~adc

Here it comes... "waaa waaa waaa.... Van is off topic again"
Yeah right. Grow up and get a brain you idiot. And then use it.:rolleyes:

Did you even read the article? Who said convicted?

It's like you never read anything, like ever - just go in and argue strawmen like your sister wildkaren.
 
Read that last line in the above post again, I put it in boldface for the stupid among us.... courtesy of the NYT.
~case closed

As always, you are not even arguing what was posted just like you totally skipped answering the simple question whether Trump is responsible for the murder by an immigrant in 2018.

The only way you can pretend to win an argument is by completely ignoring it and fabricating your own version.

Signature move of the vankaren.
 
This is coming from a Biden supporter. It is laughable. How many times have you been wrong now?

When was Biden held liable for rape in a courtroom? Cute whataboutism from wildkaren.

BUT BUT WHATABOUT BIDEN!
 
Because Trump and his supporters are known for facts.

Yes, Donald Trump is known for telling it like it is.

exGOPer believed Russia collusion. Debunked
exGOPer believed Hunter laptop was Russian disinformation. Debunked.
exGOPer believed the Obama never used spy agencies against Trump. Debunked.
exGOPer believed the Bengazi attack was because of a cartoon. Debunked.
exGOPer believed 'Hands up, don't shoot'. Debunked


The list can go on and on, but we all understand exGOPer is poor at reasoning skills.

Fani Willis Makes 'Fatal' Mistake in Donald Trump Case
R.6e7557a2a18d4eca232c9bc3b1e8489e


And exGOPer loses again.
 
You nailed it. :thumbsup:

s-l960.webp



Though Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is signing a $3 billion deal to provide security assistance to Ukraine, critics are once again complaining that Canada doesn’t spend enough on defense. In recent days, the country’s allies — particularly the US — have launched a full-court press on the Trudeau government to cough up more cash. It’s unlikely to work.

Last week, US ambassador to NATO Julianne Smith complained that not only does Canada come up short of the alliance’s 2% of GDP spending target — it's the only country with no plan to get there. Smith’s criticism echoes that of NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg, who says he expects Canada “to deliver on the pledge to invest 2% of GDP… because this is a promise we all made.”

Your leader

OIP.c-6ulIKri5KT2enMdoJkJwHaHa
 
Back
Top