J jimmiebarton May 14, 2015 #6 i enjoy chris over krauss. krauss, for all his intelligence notwithstanding, comes across shrill and annoyed if not outright angry.hey, krauss you chose to be there,right? chris is the consummate debater
i enjoy chris over krauss. krauss, for all his intelligence notwithstanding, comes across shrill and annoyed if not outright angry.hey, krauss you chose to be there,right? chris is the consummate debater
Blueline May 14, 2015 #7 When we say "something" it means a "thing". So where did that "thing" come from because for that thing to exist, there must be a cause? The word "something" isn't the correct word to use here.....but I can understand because they haven't found nor located the origin yet. We need people who "knows" rather than "thinkers" who assume. Just because we cannot see doesn't mean there is nothing there. Last edited: May 14, 2015
When we say "something" it means a "thing". So where did that "thing" come from because for that thing to exist, there must be a cause? The word "something" isn't the correct word to use here.....but I can understand because they haven't found nor located the origin yet. We need people who "knows" rather than "thinkers" who assume. Just because we cannot see doesn't mean there is nothing there.
F futurecurrents May 14, 2015 #8 There something rather then nothing because that is simply how it is. There need not be any other reason.
There something rather then nothing because that is simply how it is. There need not be any other reason.
J jem May 14, 2015 #9 the opposite of science... futurecurrents. futurecurrents said: There something rather then nothing because that is simply how it is. There need not be any other reason. More...
the opposite of science... futurecurrents. futurecurrents said: There something rather then nothing because that is simply how it is. There need not be any other reason. More...
R Ricter May 14, 2015 #10 jem said: the opposite of science... futurecurrents. More... Perhaps he's conceding defeat on the question there, but at least he's not positing unicorns as the cause of existence!
jem said: the opposite of science... futurecurrents. More... Perhaps he's conceding defeat on the question there, but at least he's not positing unicorns as the cause of existence!