If you haven't figured it out by now, it's of no use is what I assume the OP would think.FWIW, here are my takeaways from this thread.
1) Trading is gambling. It took me a long time to accept this because everything I'd previously been exposed to (books, articles, forums), and conditioned to believe, portrayed trading as something more scientific/technical with rules, rather than just a game of chance.
2) The best you can do is try and put the odds in your favour.
3) You take a long position when price is more likely to go up. You take a short position when price is more likely to go down.
4) But you always accept it's just a gamble, which may or may not pay off.
5) Position sizing and risk management are just to stop you losing money too quickly.
Figuring out 3 is the challenge but without it you won't make good money.

BTW the OP wanted to hear something apparently obvious that's not so obvious to everyone else. But your examples are just obvious.
Then it wouldn't just be GAMBLING, as you seem to want us to believe.They can't be that obvious if you look at the way most people trade; relying on indicators, patterns, waves and other BS, and thinking that money management is the key to success.
Gambling isn’t throwing money away. You can gamble with an edge. There are professional gamblers.Then it wouldn't just be GAMBLING, as you seem to want us to believe.
Again, who doesn't already know that? Hence why I wrote earlier that what he wrote was not the "obivous" that the OP was looking for but just another plain vanilla obvious.Gambling isn’t throwing money away. You can gamble with an edge. There are professional gamblers.
It’s all about odds and likelihood.
I don’t know who’s the OP but often the obvious doesn’t look obvious because of thisAgain, who doesn't already know that? Hence why I wrote earlier that what he wrote was not the "obivous" that the OP was looking for but just another plain vanilla obvious.
Then it wouldn't just be GAMBLING, as you seem to want us to believe.