Quote from river:
I appreciate your detailed answers to my recent questions in this thread. Thank you.
I must have missed your exchange with HATEtheRisk.
Iâm still trying to differentiate these âquickiesâ. Is there a list of these 7 quickies and the 10 other kinds or is this left up to us to try to deduce from information you have provide so far?
Off to the Laurel Highlands; itâs time again for the annual pilgrimage to Idlewildâ¦
-river
So far in two threads I have posted three day series that contain both calls and trades taken.
The list is well over the p> 0.05 requirement.
each three day process yielded on several analysis columns of Excel's that by trading a minimum of contracts and compounding contracts, that a person's capital is doubled. The take is also less than the market's offer.
The first two times I mentioned the analytic methodology to "sort" End Effects you either missed or did not apply it.
This time I recommend strongly that you get your Excels up to speed and merge the Excels
Everyone now knows the market has a Pattern and they know the price part of the Pattern overlaps. eveyone has heard that the RDBMS type approach Is the only analytical tool to use to measure the categories and their relationship to one another.
You also know there are five interlocking and interrelated OOE's involved.
i have mentioned that there are 24 tables to be used in coding the SQL which is a system of deploying SQL.
you now have the end of day and its carryover in the bag and you can use it eveyday.
I did a "read" of hatetherisk's bar by bar major problems and gave him TWO major ways to reduce his problem by two mesures that handled 50% of the problem as a first 50% and then a second 50% of his residue.
There is a lurker here who is focusing on me to not be able to understand his perplaxing difficulties. Eliminate from yourself his difficulties.
The pattern has five volume named pieces and one of them has six subparts total (four new parts in addition to the one that began and was first divied into two almost original parts).
Keynes is very clear so is Carnap.
You have few choices.
I believe you have made the following corerect unique required choices:
1. You chose to deduce building a system.
2. You deduced that the combo of granularity and market participants having sentiment only permits that market segments (I call them trends) MUST overlap.
3. You now know that a trend MUST begin when the trend overlap begins.
The above cannot be gibberish nor babble. It is deduced from market unintended characterisitcs that were totally unknown to the creators and managers of markets.
Convention holds that the financial industry just "grew" like "Topsy".
there are movies that appear to be historical documentaries of the financial industry giving up its integrity and replacing it with willful criminal un detected behavior. See the comedy "inside Job"
Nothing has changed, though, for making money by taking the full ofefr of the markets. the markets operate by human psychology and this ages old behavior is translatable into mathematics ONLY IF YOU UWE THE MATHEMATICS OF THE MARKETS.
I HAVE PROVIDED TO ANY USR, THE pATTERN.
I HAVE DEFINED THE PIECES OF THE PATTERN AND i DID IT MATHEMATICALLY.
Handel covered the resulting power musically.
Sister Montisori took the trouble to dd color to her pieces. Little children built in their minds Arithmetic as a consequence.
You sit with the pieces. You know that the PATTERN is a magnificent creation.
I have posted how there are brief duration trends where the full offer of the market is taken.
So you pick up a piece and only use that piece for a few bars and you complete a trend segment.
Can you imagine a chalid learning that 2 plus 2 plus 2 is a a blue stick. The blue stick is in a class called an "answer". teend segments are callede "anwsers to the problem of a complete offer of the market in a given sentiment.
Children learned addition, subtraction multiplication and division.
I worked at IBM when multiplication was called "repeated Addition". we named one factor by one name and the other factor by another name. then we sat there and decided how to make 12AU7's into little montisori rods that became known as bi stable multivibrators.
In trading and getting very very rich very very fast, you have to do what IBM called "THINK".
The market is divided into pieces. the pieces have names. the pieces can be put together like NO ONE EVER BELIEVED!!!!!!
I have said that there is nothing new for 54 years.
In designing computers, it was decided to do it with an application in mind. IBMhad a Heaven. It was called Endicott. they made cards go through a sorter at 5,000 a minute. then they made cards go through at 8,000 a minute. I had a responsibility in poughkeepsie to make chacks got through a sorter even if the checks were bent spindled or mutilated. How? put more magnetic ink in characters and put the ABA in an audience candccollect checkes they fucked up and sort them flawlessly. the night becore a computer got filled with aexcfess water from an over head AC.... BUT we sorted those checks the next AM.
I could sort checks visually and tell you what damage was the most dangerous.
I gave you over 100 trend segments. I gave you the pieces. I told you how to analize the sample.
I got to stand behind all the bankers and give a high sign to the stage to "run the sort" wqhen the baskets were collected. I knew the bankers in the audience coul;d not fuck up a check.
So I am working here on trying to get you to THINL further with the pieces and then "know that you know".
there is only a finite number of ways to fuck up a chanck when a banker is doing it.
Today, as you saqw in inside job there are only so many ways the "cheaters in the finanial industry" can fuck up a trend segment .
See if you can THINK through wht I know that no one else knows so far. NO ONE ELSE.
sister montessori, finally remembered the spelling, is looking at poor children and she has no money to teach them. BUT she can THINK. So she does the THINKING just once. And from then on poorness was not abarrier ofr children in mathematics.
I want to build minds that can be filled with ingredients to take the full market's offer.
Take the detractors. They are so poor mentally that they do not have a START button left on their pimpled asses.
Take the quants; they are smart and mentally fucked too. No C in quants. the C is missing but an extra Q and A (think the wrong way to do Q and A). If you are a cunt becoming a Q and A added quant is nothing.
Try to THINK.
