IMHO the best boxer Iâve seen was Roberto Duran. Grew up hungry and brutalised, and saw the only way out as boxing. Best summed up by Angelo Dundee: âOne gets the impression of Duran is that heâs a tough, rough brawler who just wades in and ducks nothing. But all you have to do is look at his face to see that is nonsense. Heâs not marked up. He does a lot of cute things in there.â Looked like a brawler, except for everything else, jabs, hooks, parries, traps, deflections, angles, feints, leverage, balance and power. He was a thinking boxer who created an illusion and then invited you to suck yourself in (ahem, Sugar Ray). Joe Louis was similar in that respect. Nothing out there is what it appears to be.
http://brontecapital.blogspot.com.au/2012/04/daddy-you-are-more-evil-than-i-thought.html
A28, most of this thread is taken up with idiots bashing each other, the signal to noise ratio is really low. Do you have to add to it? There are other threads. I have a hunch that TO gave everyone the answer to the question, since his return. A28, in my case reading Michel de Montaigne is not easy, you have study Montaigne, not read him. Just the way it is written I suppose.
A28, reading Montaigne has certainly led to other thoughts and roads to travel, thatâs the value. Via a circular route I discovered the writings of Marcus Aurelius, now there, be a real man.
âThe object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.â
Marcus Aurelius, Meditations.
Did the same in my trading/gambling, I hope, well, so far, so good. Value is how you perceive it.
Persistance pays.
Regards
The Bogan
PS good to see you're still kicking TO.