Quote from xburbx:
I am pretty sure it just clicked with me, the title of the thread. Not in my trading, but literally the title of the thread.
I'll answer your concern.
Let's assume that you would, in the future, consider methodically building your mind by repetition of a routine while following a system of learning the markets.
Inference builds in your mind and it forms a Swiss cheese spectrum. Your mind goes to work and you know this from questions that appear. Your mind is focussing on the holes in the Swiss cheese. It is in-filling inferences after inference so a fully differentiated spectrum results.
You know this has happened because finite math applies to markets and the one to one matching of the sensing set is matched completely one on one with the inference set.
In this process an intermediate level of skill and expertise question comes up. There are never negatives in either set above. I have shown you, in your mind, the mind skipping negatives. We could look at Shalman Khan and list the inference missing in his relative to mathematics and autism.
There are not many autistic people here.
The question that comes from your mind: When is the obvious not so obvious?
Answer: When your mind is not able to put a set of inferences into a differentiating spectrum.
All the people I listed also have this stumbling block.
There are two things to incorporate into the repetition work required; both are obvious but no one sees them.
1. Replace continuing the use of up/down with left/right.
2. Recognize an entry and exit are identical but just opposites in left and right (You dropped the up/down already, so don't read my requirement of you as an up/downer.). Using this recognition begin to do decisions and timely action as hold and reverse. A subset of Q's that will arrive is how to differentiate a retrace from a reversal at each's inception.
Slowly mull through what prevented you from not seeing these obvious things and using them instead of what you presently have as stumbling blocks. LOL.... I used a negative to make my point of your seeing these obvious things.
To see and understand why Khan should have known before hand why an autistic child or anyone who is autistic would immediately succeed at doing drills in math, begin to read and understand how Temple Grandlin got her PhD as an autistic person.
I had the pleasure of teaching for ten years. Never gave a lecture or a "lesson". Never wasted time in class having tests taken (they were done at home or in the dorm) My average 100% sample pre/post shift in SAT scores was 123 points. I answered questions in class posed by students who designed their own homework. That's all. All they saw every day was a mind doing critical thinking. They ALWAYS finished the year's work by end of February. Then they could study whatever they wanted. They didn't choose the maths on Khan's list. He never, as yet, asked anyone what they wanted to study.
So a trend begins and ends at the same point of inference. Your work of repetition has just been cut in half.
An OB is ALWAYS two points in a pattern....lol...... There is only one pattern.
Why is it not obvious that there is only one pattern in the markets? LOL ..... the negative again.
Answer: everyone has the same additional stumbling block: you use time and have continued to do so when you MUST substitute events for time. The market operates on an Order Of Events only.
Don't fall down on the slippery ice .........LOL.......
