nysestocks
Guest
Quote from Trader666:
nysestocks, now that you've opened this can of worms, more of my opinion as to why the obvious is not always so obvious :eek:
I would define "trading correctly" as executing a trading plan or methodology that is more likely than not to be profitable in accordance with its elements/rules. So I see two components: having a valid concept and executing it properly.
The possibilities are:
- executing a valid concept properly
- executing a valid concept improperly
- executing an invalid concept properly
- executing an invalid concept improperly
Problem is that the market might positively or negatively reinforce any of these.
So using your financial trade to illustrate, I'd say you may or may not have traded correctly even though you made a profit. If your rationale for the trade was valid (why you made $) and you executed your trade as planned, yes. But if you bought BAC because when you pulled up the chart, a BAC commercial aired on TV and you thought that was a sign from God, no. A cousin of this would be if you bought your stock for seemingly valid reasons but it increased for other reasons, in which case I'd also say you did not trade correctly.
BAC sure looks like it was a good buy around the $3.20 level with the $8 target!
Concepts, ideas, systems, approaches, etc, etc, will indeed pass through the mind of a trader.
However, the obvious is such that you avoid all the distractions that will "waste" your precious time!
What you say is neither wrong nor right; it is just the path that many take due to their exposure.
When one gets to a certain stage in life, and many wrong paths have been taken, then "correct" path is easier to find.
A recent discussion with a trader raised a very important topic - I will post some related details and let people see what they make of it?
- those who want to partake can start posting their entry levels and stop levels - and if you have enough money you can place an AON bet if you are brave enough!