Which one would I pick, The normal or the abnormal? You pose an excellent question. I will answer with a story. The story tells of a lesson I learned the hard way some 22 years back as a database administrator (DBA). The story goes like this.Quote from nysestocks:
You see Rabbitone, people are not to be blamed for what they do and do not know!
Think about it - they can only deduce from the information that is available to them.
Applying logic to this situation, it is apparent that for one to make rapid progress one needs to be able to differentiate between what is "normal", and what is "abnormal".
Which one would you pick - the normal or the abnormal?
I was in charge of all of the databases for a large steel mill. The databases ran the mill because it was in charge of clocking every worker in or out at every gate. A freak process crashed the databases and it shut down for 16 hours at tremendous cost (because workers had to be clocked in manually).
The week after the crash I was hauled into a meeting with the companies head DBA. He asked the question âWhy didnât you test for such a problem.â My answer was âIt was too freak an occurrence to test for.â For using that answer I was reprimanded.
Later in private because we were good friends he relented some and told me âI understand how you feel an accident happened to me about 9 years ago like yours. I got my medicine just like you got yours and I deserved itâ¦â Thatâs when I learned what Iâm going to tell youâ¦.â And then he said ââ¦itâs the unexpected or abnormal that rules business and our lives. Itâs what we are judged on. Forget about testing what can happen and worry about how you will handle the abnormal problems. That going to define you for the rest of your lifeâ¦â
So I will always pick abnormal. Because if you try and understand what is abnormal you can then define what is normal.
That is how I trade. I have spent countless hours in testing systems (5800 tests over 10 years) and trade management (6 procedures) weeding out the abnormal to defined what is normal in trading a daily automated system. I had no choice because there is no definition in any book or paper that describes in detail how to trade swings or positions in automation.
This is the reason traders fail today. They read a trading book and believe they can use it as a business model. I have yet to see any written business models for any type of trading that will work in any live environment. Most trading today is large sets of rules of thumb which are really no a business plan.
Many traders who succeed today donât even understand why they have succeeded. Some are hanging by a thread. What most of them do is piece their business procedures together by trial and error. All it takes is one abnormality and they are broke.
So I agree with you 100% NyseStocks people are not to be blamed for what they do not know. We are fed like mushrooms. But that does not stop us from trading. That is why I have no sympathy for those who risk their money trading using business methods they do not attempt to review on their own.
This industry in my opinion is in its infancy. For most types of retail trading we have yet to methods or process that allows us to define and build trading as a business. Every other profession has reams on this subject. But all we get is bits and pieces of flotsam and jetsam to try to define ourselves as trading business entities. Here is a simple example. Try to find a good definition or any definition of trade management from any one?
And now I have a question for you, if you please. Name one book or author that as suitably defined, using business not trading terminology, what a trading business model should consist of?

