MN,
Maybe you can answer this one?..
J_S
I hope that you don't think that I know anything. What I said: "Me, myself and I" was merely indicating that at the end of the quest it will be realised that the answers being sought were at the starting point all along - like the story of 'The Alchemist' - meaning within yourself. Control of your inner demons is the biggest issue for many traders I think.
I trade from the 1 min chart but look to higher time frames for context, 5min, 1hour and daily. You can use DOM, T&S if it makes sense to you, if not then discard it. Too much info is distracting so I personally just use price/time charts and no indicators or volume, just horizontal levels. Squiggly lines are not for me. Its necessary to know the time of economic announcements so that sudden price movements don't catch you unawares.
On one of the sites that I used to visit, ET and Trade2win were regarded as the zoo where the monkeys play. I can see that myself and you've probably got that impression too judging by the sniping posts that have recently appeared - try not to get drawn into an argument with these idiots as they are the ones playing mind games. If you get something out of this and other threads that is of value then that's all that matters, even if you don't fully grasp the precise meaning of some of the details. For example the phrase 'Use the box to save your sox' has been used, to me than means a box within which the reason for a trade makes sense and is confined by a stop, a target, a starting time an end time. Allowing a trade to persist outside the box represents ego, hope and desperation. If that interpretation isn't what the OP had in mind then so what, it doesn't matter as my interpretation makes sense to me. The buzy bee allegory brings to mind trading within a range, entering near the extremes with a small stop loss, with a target well within the range and doing that repeatedly. Eventually the bee will fly off to another level.
I suspect that those people on here who claim to have sussed it (the obvious) have merely come to a conclusion that makes sense to themselves but which is possibly quite different to what others claim to have sussed out. Its a characteristic that those who make such claims don't actually state what it is they think they have seen, which helps to perpetuate a myth of a secret. It should be blindingly obvious that there is no such thing and that the cryptic nature of posts by the OP et al. are simply puzzles with the aim of getting others to think for themselves.

ops:
