Quote from rossky:
The Oracle,
I really appreciate your efforts. My personal problem here is that I need a clear definition first and then a thorough explanation of what it is and why it is what it is.
u must really understand that most of what is written and discussed about trading is of no real value
---
If I happen to figure out something on my own I will look for confirmation countless times and often will do quite opposite to what I know to test the accuracy of my discovery. And that's basically how we all learn since the moment we are born.
things are the way they are..since time began..and will always be that way..for..that is just the way it is
---
Children will do what they are asked to do out of fear of being punished or the prospect of being rewarded for their compliance. Otherwise they will be testing you 'till you turn blue. They are stubborn and rebels because they figure out very quickly that quite often you yourself do things that are opposite to what you say are right things to do.
children look and listen and repeat what they see and hear..for that is how all living beings are wired..at some stage the brain will start to question why things are the way they are..this does not mean things will change..but..if the person changes the way of think and act..then the circumstances that the person finds him/her self..will change..it is as simple as that..all external change firstly requires an internal change..if u keep doing the same thing then u will always get the same results
---
In the beginning this thread was so promising. Despite the fact that it has provided for me some valuable insights it remains at the same time the source of confusion.
it is not the thread itself that has u confused..it is your way of thinking..for..if u changed your thought in relation to one aspect of trading..and then done the required work to gain the required experiences..you would then more than likely write..this thread is brilliant and showed me what to do..but..the reality is that you done what was required..and the thread was only the catalyst in the process change that was required..it is as simple as ABC