Seriously, his screening process wasn't all too bad as it produced what appeared to be good momentum selections, which I concluded could probably yield much better results than his 12.6% average return per trade over an average of 4 months, and eliminate his constant capital infusion needs and costs of lost opportunities, as well as reduce cost of losses if some technical methods and money management principles were used, but apparently his steadfast ego doesn't permit him to see how these modifications would make his method that much better. He acts coy, spins answers, avoids answers, starts new topics instead of staying on topic, asks immaterial questions back, poses specious arguments, uses his well worn 'you didn't go to Wharton so why should I listen to you' argument, which makes one wonder then why post here at all... he's his own worst enemy, really. Too bad, because every thread of his could've been more constructive. I mean, if I had a method that produced 30% a year yet with such long holds and holding through losing positions and needing so many new funds to keep going, if anyone had ideas for upping the performance, man, I'd be all ears and less mouth.