Why Hillary can't be President

[Tsing Tao]

"If."

I'm merely pointing out that the odds favor Clinton. Meanwhile, jembot started a whole thread pontificating about why Clinton CAN'T be president. What was that about ass bites?

It'll come back to haunt him too, if he's wrong. Just like the infamous "Jem Algo".

 

[jem]

1. the algo was correct. the polls were skewed with ridiculous samples. One pool had obama up 21 points because it far over sampled democrats..

2. this thread has caused (I mean documented) hillary to be downgraded from inevitable to shes in trouble and the democrats are talking to biden.

.

 

[jem]

here is an example of my prescient punditry from the early days of this thread.

its amazing that the media and lefties have been working so hard to make Hillary seem inevitable and she is not even leading in Iowa and New Hampshire vs someone who is not running.

can you believe the crap the media promotes.
its almost as if you can just believe everything the media states is a lie.

She is a really unpleasant lying leftist who is not unkown.
She has very little chance if there are solid alternative democrats.... presuming the voting machines are not rigged.

 

[jem]

and this is what the fredie foresight crowd was saying.
no hillary fatigue... lol.

Warren only exists to make Hillary look more moderate rather than left. She has no shot at the presidency.

There is no "visceral hillary fatigue" in the country, only hatred by the right.

Now, who is Jeb's VP running mate? I can't think of anyone out there from the old Bush clan to step in.

 

[jem]

then this...

you heard it hear first folks.

http://nypost.com/2015/02/14/bill-clintons-libido-threatens-to-derail-hillary-again/

Bill’s libido threatens to derail Hillary — again
By Maureen Callahan

February 14, 2015 | 7:31pm


She hasn’t even announced, but the question has already resurfaced: Will Bill Clinton’s baggage derail Hillary Clinton’s presidential hopes?

Just a few weeks ago, reports broke that Bill Clinton had flown at least 11 times on “The Lolita Express” — a private plane owned by the mysterious financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. According to Virginia Roberts, who claims to have been one of Epstein’s many teenage sex slaves, Clinton also visited Epstein’s private Caribbean retreat, known as “Orgy Island.”

Modal Trigger

Is Bill Clinton’s baggage going to derail Hillary Clinton’s presidential hopes?Photo: WireImage

“I remember asking Jeffrey, ‘What’s Bill Clinton doing here?’” Roberts said in 2011. The former president, she added, was accompanied by four young girls during his stay — two of whom were among Epstein’s regular sex partners. “And [Jeffrey] laughed it off and said, ‘Well, he owes me a favor.’ He never told me what favors they were.”

Clinton also spent years traveling and partying with Ron Burkle, a billionaire bachelor with a penchant for very young girls. Clinton spent so much time on Burkle’s private plane that it came to be known in Burkle’s circle as “Air F—k One.”

And that is to say nothing of Bill’s solicitation of mystery donors, the concerns about financial malfeasance at the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, Bill’s racially charged verbal gaffes during Hillary’s 2008 bid and the alleged longtime, serious mistress who diverted Hillary’s presidential campaign from larger problems.

To be clear, none of this is ancient history, affairs and misbehaviors that the nation has absorbed and seemingly forgiven. These are ongoing compulsions, tugs toward self-destruction that look to destroy his wife instead.

Bill never stopped being Bill.
----

more at the link...

 

[jem]

my favorite post.

 

[Humpy]

It's a problem that the public can't be told the specifics and two different Senators on the Intelligence Committee are already disagreeing along political lines. If they don't appoint an independent prosecutor, they should appoint a special intelligence master who is universally respected to convey the degree of seriousness to the public.

Bernie Sanders is right to respect the procedure and avoid political attacks.

They would be hard pushed to find anyone of integrity and so are left to the usual sell out types. Money gets everywhere and buys its opinion, which is then worthless. Banana Republic politics where money and threats create the new reality ! Truth didn't stand a chance.

 

[fhl]

When a republican is president, we're told that it's beyond inappropriate for him to have any litmus tests for selecting a supreme court nominee. If the nominee has any pre-existing views on divisive subjects, democrats claim it disqualifies the nominee.

What about when there's a democrat president?

"Hillary Clinton was asked a specific question about Court nominations during the Democratic debate on MSNBC on Feb.4. She promised that her nominees will have to be “loud and clear” that they will vote to overturn the Court’s campaign finance decision.

Only a few candidates have included the Constitution and Court appointments on the “issues” page of their campaign websites. Hillary Clinton recently said she had “a bunch of “litmus tests” for Court appointees." =Americanthinker.com

They can get away with this because republicans let them get away with anything.

 

[fhl]

When a republican is president, we're told that it's beyond inappropriate for him to have any litmus tests for selecting a supreme court nominee. If the nominee has any pre-existing views on divisive subjects, democrats claim it disqualifies the nominee.

What about when there's a democrat president?

"Hillary Clinton was asked a specific question about Court nominations during the Democratic debate on MSNBC on Feb.4. She promised that her nominees will have to be “loud and clear” that they will vote to overturn the Court’s campaign finance decision.

Only a few candidates have included the Constitution and Court appointments on the “issues” page of their campaign websites. Hillary Clinton recently said she had “a bunch of “litmus tests” for Court appointees." =Americanthinker.com

They can get away with this because republicans let them get away with anything.

I'll add one thing to this.
If the democrats think that Supreme Court decisions like the one on campaign finance can be overturned, then homosexual marriage is not a settled issue, either.

 

[Scataphagos]

my favorite post.

Wealth redistribution and the demonizing of unequal outcomes, in spite of all of their ills and evils, is a politically EASY sell to the hoi polloi. That's why we have it. And that's why so much of the world lives in poverty.