Why Hillary can't be President

Errol Louis: There Is ‘Bill Cosby Thing’ With Clinton Sex Allegations, Trump ‘Could Very Likely’ Change Discussion’s Course

...
Louis continued, “there are accusations that go back, decades about what bill clinton did. some of them are quite lurid, some of them seem spectacular, some of them seem hard to believe, accusations of sexual assault and so forth. The people are still out there though. The people have never given up those claims in some ways. If Donald Trump is saying, ‘I’m going to put my very large megaphone behind — or in front of some of those women, and let them say what they have to say, including Hillary Clinton’s role,’ it will be at a minimum a distraction, but it could very likely change the course of that discussion.


http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016...-could-very-likely-change-discussions-course/


change the discussion course, is code for...
cost Hillary the election despite the liberal media's efforts to limit the coverage and conversation...


I would note... that this was obvious to everyone accept establishment republicans.... he establishment republicans are so addicted to selling out their base for election bribes/cash... they cost themselves easy wins.

In a matter of about 3 weeks including holidays... Trump flipped the script again. (just until a few weeks ago we had the media lecturing us on why Bills past was off limits)
That is why you have to enjoy his candidacy... he has the guts and the enough brains... .. to flip scripts on these sellouts in d.c. and their media propagandists on issue after issue.
 
Last edited:
Charles Krauthammer on HillaryClinton

Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest. The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at ts finest, and we are financing it.

Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history. This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free. Here's how it works:

1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case one in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did -- contributing mega millions. I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.
6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result -- foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.

Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess
who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted. As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. security at risk.

Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this: Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and countries in need?

This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling. Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take. Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal, and they are Slick! Warning: They could be back in the White House in January 2017. Don't let it happen. Remember, most people are not well informed. You must inform and educate them.

:finger::(:mad:
 
Yannis said:
Remember, most people are not well informed. You must inform and educate them.
More...

A large percentage of the DemoCrap voters will vote for Hillary, regardless of her lies and criminality... if for no other reason than they want to be able to say they voted for the 1st woman president.... just as they did voting for the 1st black president.

The Founders never intended that half-wits and parasites with no skin in the game would even be allowed to vote, let alone become a majority.

:(
 
Last edited:
The Clintons may be guilty as charged but just look at the Rep(tile) opposition. The US voters love a showman or an outlaw. Scumbags like Jesse James and Billy the Kid are folk heroes. OK they murdered a few and stole from others but they are folk heroes. Honest Joe who attends church on Sunday is out of the race before it begins. Now that says something to me.

The US has to try and work out just who they want running the country. Don't forget JFK was elected by his father using the mob's help.
 
Last edited:
did I forget to mention... that her personality is so annoying and here integrity so low, the more she opens her mouth the more she loses votes... even to a 74 year old pre commie.


https://ca.news.yahoo.com/democratic-donor-contacts-biden-allies-possible-run-010248619.html

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A prominent Democratic donor worried about the party's chances of winning the presidency emailed dozens of fans of Vice President Joe Biden on Friday, urging them to remain prepared to donate if Biden jumps into the race.

The donor, Bill Bartmann, cited new polling showing Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont nearly tied with the Hillary Clinton, eroding the 30-point lead the former secretary of state held at the end of last year. Bartmann and other party insiders are concerned that Sanders, a self-proclaimed Democratic socialist, is too far to the left to win against a Republican in the Nov. 8 presidential election.

"We cannot afford to lose the White House," Bartmann wrote in the email, seen by Reuters.
 
Personally I would not waste 50c donating to the party machines. They swallow millions. Do the big donors get something back ? I guess so, but nobody knows what.
Donations are made public in the UK and limited.
 
Donations to individual candidates in the US are public and limited. That's why Hillary's lavish speaking fees are so controversial. Clearly they are under the table contributions.

It's not a new practice for Hillary. In Arkansas, she magically reaped $100k trading commodity futures after her husband became governor. Probably just beginner's luck. She was a highly paid attorney and corporate board member, no doubt chosen for her winning personality.

After Jimmy Carter left the White House, he built houses for poor people. The Clintons made over $100 mill giving speeches etc, and their foundation raked in no telling how much from various foreign governments.
 
Now that we know everything we know about concussions, do we really want Hillary Clinton, who has suffered a severe concussion, to have her finger on nuke button. She should be disqualified for medical reasons at the least.
 
wildchild said:
Now that we know everything we know about concussions, do we really want Hillary Clinton, who has suffered a severe concussion, to have her finger on nuke button. She should be disqualified for medical reasons at the least.
More...
Less dangerous than Chump imho
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top