All you need to do is take a look at the foundation filings as a charity over the past years to see that it is a fact. The Clinton Foundation is also ranked by all the organizations that track charities as a foundation that people should not donate to.
Why Hillary can't be President
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
All you need to do is take a look at the foundation filings as a charity over the past years to see that it is a fact. The Clinton Foundation is also ranked by all the organizations that track charities as a foundation that people should not donate to.
I'm not sure it's quite as clear as you'd like it to be:
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.profile&ein=311580204#watchlist
If and when it becomes clear, please be sure that my response will be appropriate and not biased. Until then, I will have my bias as you have yours.
The only real question is why a grand jury is not looking into the issue of enormous contributions being made to the Clinton foundations and other offshore foundations they apparently control at the same time significant govenrment action affecting those donors was taking place.
The guy who wrote the book on it was laying it out last night, on Fox of course, since the mainstream media have declared the subject closed. All the liberals had a great time persecuting former governor Bob McConnell of virginia. He and his wife accepted gifts from a guy and threw a party or two at the governor's mansion for him. For that, they got lengthy prison terms.
We have examples of massive undisclosed conflicts of interest where Hillary was accepting money with one hand and making government policy with the other. And using her private email account to do it. Now we see why she was so obsessive about keeping it all secret.
The guy who wrote the book on it was laying it out last night, on Fox of course, since the mainstream media have declared the subject closed. All the liberals had a great time persecuting former governor Bob McConnell of virginia. He and his wife accepted gifts from a guy and threw a party or two at the governor's mansion for him. For that, they got lengthy prison terms.
We have examples of massive undisclosed conflicts of interest where Hillary was accepting money with one hand and making government policy with the other. And using her private email account to do it. Now we see why she was so obsessive about keeping it all secret.
On February 18, 2015, The Washington Post reported that, "the foundation has won accolades from philanthropy experts and has drawn bipartisan support, with members of the George W. Bush administration often participating in its programs."
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.profile&ein=311580204#watchlist
Let's see how it plays out, shall we?
Remember when Kerry was swiftboated? All of the accusations were later proven to be false. But by then the damage had been done. I know you probably would mind a repeat of that episode, but I'm hoping that some people learned from it.
- The article also states that "in posting its donor data, the foundation goes beyond legal requirements, and experts say its transparency level exceeds that of most philanthropies."
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.profile&ein=311580204#watchlist
Let's see how it plays out, shall we?
Remember when Kerry was swiftboated? All of the accusations were later proven to be false. But by then the damage had been done. I know you probably would mind a repeat of that episode, but I'm hoping that some people learned from it.
Let's take a look at the press. The Clinton Foundation has been waging an open battle to have the Foundation removed from Charity Navigators' watchlist. This pressure has caused the Charity Foundation CEO to quit in disgust that Charity Navigator gave into their demands. Let's take a look at the press over the pass few months...
Only 6% Clinton Foundation Expenditures Go To Charity
Clinton Foundation Battles Charity Navigator on Designation
Clinton Foundation Put On Charity ‘Watch List’
Report: Clinton Foundation Tried to ‘Strong-Arm’ Leading Charity Watchdog
The Clinton Foundation’s Behind-the-Scenes Battle With a Charity Watchdog Group
And recently after the pressure from the Clinton Foundation, Charity Navigator pulled the Clinton Foundation from its website while stating the following:
"Why isn't this organization rated?
We had previously evaluated this organization, but have since determined that this charity's atypical business model can not be accurately captured in our current rating methodology. Our removal of The Clinton Foundation from our site is neither a condemnation nor an endorsement of this charity. We reserve the right to reinstate a rating for The Clinton Foundation as soon as we identify a rating methodology that appropriately captures its business model.
What does it mean that this organization isn’t rated?
It simply means that the organization doesn't meet our criteria. A lack of a rating does not indicate a positive or negative assessment by Charity Navigator."
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.profile&ein=311580204#.VWiAAkbbeds
Now the Clinton Foundation is going after other well-known Charity rating websites.
Well, your mind is made up, so I suppose this exchange has reached its conclusion.
As is yours.
An understandable conclusion for someone who feels the need to disparage but not the need to read my preceding posts on which the disparagement is based. I understand.
Your mo never changes, you accuse other people of viewing things through a partisan lens while you view yourself as the ultimate bipartisan observer, while you only ever end up on one side of the coin time after time after time. I have seen GWB switch up his view on things alot more than ive ever seen from you, so im going to have to say if anyone is actually analyzing the details of this case, and not just viewing it as a partisan, that person would have to be GWB.