Why Hillary can't be President

If Hillary runs, I believe she'll win. Not because she should (or even because she'd be anything other than a poor president), but because the parasite class will vote for more parasitism for themselves to the exclusion of all else. That and the high percentage black block vote.. and likely the same by Hispanics. Oh, and let's not forget the female vote. Hillary would get a big boost just because she's a woman.

I don't see how "conservatism" + "white candidate" can overcome all of that.
 
BSAM said:
Despite of all that Bill & Hillary have been involved in, you'll be surprised at how many dopey citizens will cast a vote for her.
Watch.
She could even win.
More...
Rock Paper Scissors
Black Woman White
 
Even though the next Presidential election is still more than three years away already there is much talk about Sen. Hillary Clinton as the most likely Democratic candidate.
All this talk is coming from Republicans, not Democrats.
Republicans want Hillary to run. Democrats — at least those in hi-level positions — don't.
Realistically, Hillary can't win. She and the Democrats know that. That's why she can't run.
On the surface Hillary has many of the characteristics necessary to run and win. She has very high name recognition. She's smart and articulate. She's a skilled politician and a sophisticated policy wonk. She has lots of experience under the microscope of public scrutiny. She's positioned herself on issues slightly to the right of the Democratic Party's center. She's a woman, which presumably brings in the left of center Democrats who might not like all of her issue stands. With the help of her famous husband, she can raise a lot of money.
But she can't win.
 
that is good comedy / sarcasm...

a. frequently she is not only not articulate she says things that betray her out of touch pre commie belief system..
you would have thought this was trained out of her by now... but there is a strong chance she can't help herself... sort of like biden

b. clearly an unskilled politican... blowing a massive lead against obama for a host of reasons even though she had a skilled politician next to her.

c. she has no successful experience to draw from... when asked she could not articulate a single successful thing she did as secretary of state.

d. nobody buys her positioning because she has destroyed herself with her bidenesque gaffes. shes a 60s radical who has not modified her views.

e. she a women whom turns off at least half the country when she opens her mouth.

d. her husband could raise a ton of money but when given a chance the money went to Obama? why?





Pravin Choudhary said:
Even though the next Presidential election is still more than three years away already there is much talk about Sen. Hillary Clinton as the most likely Democratic candidate.
All this talk is coming from Republicans, not Democrats.
Republicans want Hillary to run. Democrats — at least those in hi-level positions — don't.
Realistically, Hillary can't win. She and the Democrats know that. That's why she can't run.
On the surface Hillary has many of the characteristics necessary to run and win. She has very high name recognition. She's smart and articulate. She's a skilled politician and a sophisticated policy wonk. She has lots of experience under the microscope of public scrutiny. She's positioned herself on issues slightly to the right of the Democratic Party's center. She's a woman, which presumably brings in the left of center Democrats who might not like all of her issue stands. With the help of her famous husband, she can raise a lot of money.
But she can't win.
More...
 
Last edited:
loyek590 said:
if Susan Rice switched sides and ran on the republican ticket I would get off my butt in 2016 and vote a straight republican ticket. I always liked her, and Lord knows there is plenty of hatred between her and Hillary. She really wanted to be the next Sec of State, and Hillary just threw her under the bus. Get ready, that is Hillary's MO. We are looking at 8 years of that crap.
More...
Hillary hasn't proven herself to have any qualities to lead the US,
I wish Dems had a better candidate.
 
warren leads hillary by 7 in Iowa and by 3 in new hampshire.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/shock-poll-warren-leads-clinton-in-iowa-n.h./article/2560098

Populist groups cheering "Run Warren Run," today released 2016 election polls from Iowa and New Hampshire showing Sen. Elizabeth Warren ahead of dominant Democrat Hillary Clinton.

The YouGov poll of likely Democratic voters for MoveOn.org and Democracy for America also found that 79 percent want Warren and majorities support her anti-Wall Street positions.

Warren has said she doesn't plan to challenge Clinton, though several others have indicated that they are looking at a bid, including Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.

RELATED: In 2016 bid, Sanders would target Clinton's Wall Street ties, war vote
 
Choices for President:

1. Hillary Clinton
2. Elizabeth Warren
3. Joe Biden
4. Bernie Sanders
5. An Arizona saguaro cactus.

I'd definitely prefer the cactus to be in the Oval Office.
 
its amazing that the media and lefties have been working so hard to make Hillary seem inevitable and she is not even leading in Iowa and New Hampshire vs someone who is not running.

can you believe the crap the media promotes.
its almost as if you can just believe everything the media states is a lie.

She is a really unpleasant lying leftist who is not unkown.
She has very little chance if there are solid alternative democrats.... presuming the voting machines are not rigged.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top