Why Hillary can't be President
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
Agreed...it's difficult for many people to acknowledge that certain groups vote exclusively based on race. But it's not limited solely to elections, I've seen it first hand in many facets of everyday life...the problem is it's not considered "racist" if a minority acts in said manner.
This is what passes for a "journalist" these days. Any wonder why Clinton gets a free pass for her outright refusal to speak to the media since announcing her candidacy?
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/abc-anchor-apologizes-not-disclosing-142931019.html
Of course, it's an honest mistake. Isn't it always when it's a democrat?
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/abc-anchor-apologizes-not-disclosing-142931019.html
Of course, it's an honest mistake. Isn't it always when it's a democrat?
Wake up and get real!
95% of blacks voted for Odumbo because he's a (partial) black. That was enough to sway the presidential elections and doom America.
The RNC Should Ban George Stephanopoulos From Participating In 2016 Debates
MAY 14, 2015 By Sean Davis
After being questioned by the Washington Free Beacon about large donations he made to the Clinton Foundation, George Stephanopoulos of ABC News disclosed to Politico that he had funneled $50,000 to the tax-exempt organization in 2013 and 2014. Stephanopoulos’s secret donations to the Clintons’ non-profit came while he was professionally covering the family for ABC News. And then, after he was busted by the Free Beacon, he decided to leak the news of his secret Clinton cash contributions to Politicoin order to deny Free Beacon its scoop. Classy, huh?
It gets even worse, though. It wasn’t just that Stephanopoulos made the contributions while he was supposed to be objectively covering the Clinton family on behalf of a major broadcast news organization. It’s bigger than that. Just last month, Stephanopoulos interviewed Peter Schweizer, the author of Clinton Cash, a blockbuster investigative expose of the Clinton Foundation’s finances. Not once did Stephanopoulos disclose his cash ties to the Clinton Foundation. Stephanopoulos, who we are supposed to believe is an objective journalist, deliberately chose to hide the fact that he was a Clinton Foundation donor.
“It was an honest mistake,” ABC News told Politico, in apparent attempt to suggest to its viewers that not only does ABC News not care about transparency in reporting, but that it’s also unaware of the actual meanings of the words “honest” and “mistake.”
How do you solve a problem like mens rea? Easy: by banning it from participating in any 2016 presidential debates. That’s a no-brainer. Under no circumstances should George Stephanopoulos be allowed by the Republican National Committee to set foot on any debate stage. By his actions, he has proven he cannot be trusted to be an objective, transparent, and accountable debate moderator. But it shouldn’t stop there.
http://thefederalist.com/2015/05/14...anopoulos-from-participating-in-2016-debates/
MAY 14, 2015 By Sean Davis
After being questioned by the Washington Free Beacon about large donations he made to the Clinton Foundation, George Stephanopoulos of ABC News disclosed to Politico that he had funneled $50,000 to the tax-exempt organization in 2013 and 2014. Stephanopoulos’s secret donations to the Clintons’ non-profit came while he was professionally covering the family for ABC News. And then, after he was busted by the Free Beacon, he decided to leak the news of his secret Clinton cash contributions to Politicoin order to deny Free Beacon its scoop. Classy, huh?
It gets even worse, though. It wasn’t just that Stephanopoulos made the contributions while he was supposed to be objectively covering the Clinton family on behalf of a major broadcast news organization. It’s bigger than that. Just last month, Stephanopoulos interviewed Peter Schweizer, the author of Clinton Cash, a blockbuster investigative expose of the Clinton Foundation’s finances. Not once did Stephanopoulos disclose his cash ties to the Clinton Foundation. Stephanopoulos, who we are supposed to believe is an objective journalist, deliberately chose to hide the fact that he was a Clinton Foundation donor.
“It was an honest mistake,” ABC News told Politico, in apparent attempt to suggest to its viewers that not only does ABC News not care about transparency in reporting, but that it’s also unaware of the actual meanings of the words “honest” and “mistake.”
How do you solve a problem like mens rea? Easy: by banning it from participating in any 2016 presidential debates. That’s a no-brainer. Under no circumstances should George Stephanopoulos be allowed by the Republican National Committee to set foot on any debate stage. By his actions, he has proven he cannot be trusted to be an objective, transparent, and accountable debate moderator. But it shouldn’t stop there.
http://thefederalist.com/2015/05/14...anopoulos-from-participating-in-2016-debates/
didn't you tell us she has a good heart and she has good experience and she was trustworthy?
reality...
she has a depraved heart, she failed at everything at the state department and she sold our interests out for money.
And you are a massive loon.[/QUOTE]
reality...
she has a depraved heart, she failed at everything at the state department and she sold our interests out for money.
And you are a massive loon.[/QUOTE]