Quote from zf trader:
This idea my sound a little funny at first but hear me out. One of the problems that GM has is that they employ a lot of people that they don't need anymore but can't fire. So why can't they have them do something other than make cars? There is no way that the union contract says "must be employed to make automobiles". Any sort of positive return on all the un-used labour would help pay for pensions.
(Screw Ichan short the stock)
Yes the union does specify what a person can or can not do. If they are union electricians you cannot have them cleaning floors, etc. If they are supposed to build cars, you can cross train them for other car building tasks, but you cant have them do building maintenence or selling cars.
We set up a large system in Manhatten. Pretty tough unions in manhatten. We needed another shelf put up. They had to get the carpenters union in there and it would take a few days. The materials were there, and I wanted to finish up so I tried to start making the shelf. I was told to put down the tools, because the carpenters union HAS to build the shelf.
The carpenter finally came and built the shelf. He did not paint it to match the other shelves. There was paint there, but they told me that the painters union had to paint the shelf. By this point I thought they were kidding me but the building manager said that if they let non-union labor do any work, the unions will set up picket lines in front of their buildings until they pay the unions for the work that was done, even if the union did not perform any of the work.
Unions are killing this country. Maybe there was a time and place for them, but that time has passed.
PHIQ - news) demanded 24,000 hourly job cuts over three years, a plan which union leaders refuse to even submit to the company's workers for a vote, the Detroit Free Press reported on Thursday.