So you prefer to remain ignorant. Good to know.
So you prefer to remain ignorant. Good to know.
So you prefer to remain ignorant. Good to know.
Words have meaning, saying you are in favor of international governance to deal with international problems caused by globalization doesn't mean you favor one world government.
You are nothing but a brain dead troll who posts such dishonest arguments to push your fake news narrative.
you made a nasty rant about me saying he promotes one world govt.
so when you see a video where he says we need to take steps toward interntional governance..
wait... I don't even get what the hell you are trying say.
How could taking steps towards international governance... not be promoting one world government?
I can't wait to see your contrived bullshit...
Yes, they are different things, saying one need international governance for SPECIFIC issues which he mentioned (like climate change and globalization) because the problems are not contained within national borders doesn't mean that he is advocating that there should be a single world government. If he wanted to say one world government then he would have said so, you are trying to impose YOUR conspiracy on the term for your narrative.
United Nations isn't a single government, cooperation between international entities doesn't mean one world government.
Yours is classic anti-Semitic conspiracy blaming Jews for their one world agenda, it's nothing new from your ilk.
I prefer to follow facts, you prefer to make claims and blame others for not believing in your made up fantasies blaming all black people because they all look the same to you.
I never said a thing about "all black people". There are many black people who do not support violent BLM protests. There are many black people who I work with, who live in my community, and are very decent people.
This thread is about George Soros' OSF providing financial support for BLM organizations (something that the minutes of their own meetings state they do), and these organization spending the money on creating protests via social media (which is their entire stated purpose), and the regularity that these protests turn violent & violate the law.
I am following the facts... while you are merely diverging into the type of fact-free nonsense you spew above.
You are not following facts, funding a group doesn't mean the group was anyway involved in the violence and in this instant you have provided no evidence that OSF funded groups acted in any violent way.
This is why I said you are unable to make distinctions because all black people look the same to you.
Where is your fact to prove that these OSF funded group engaged in violence? You have provided none. Making tangential connections because both are black is the bias I am talking about, it's undeniable.