Why evolution fails when compared to Inteligent Design

Quote from L-Kabong:



1)Evolution does not negate the possibility of a creator. 2)It does not jibe with literalist views of the bible, which dates the universe at about 6000 years.
1) Which is why evolution is a harmless theory.
2) I suspect more atheist's believe this than Christians, but hey knock yourself out with making strawmen.
 
Quote from gastropod:

I read the article and it got me thinking about the numbers...which led me to this site...
http://michaelgr.com/2008/04/06/how-many-atoms-to-encode-the-human-genome/

Using that info and (another unknown quantity of a site...)
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=186794

...from the first article...there are 204 billion atoms in "average" DNA. The second article states that humans share about 99.9 of their DNA...would mean that the "average human" would take...
204,000,000,000 * 0.999 = 203,796,000,000 atoms in common...meaning random chance and energy...and the presence of the right atoms had to align in the right way to form a human...and more searching on the net led me to this article about Steyer and "information" entropy...and I am tired and have to go...flying 6,000 miles tomorrow....have to pick up another day...but, here is the article...
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53199

Ciao,
gastropod

Ok...firstly, I think you need to view this through a different lense. It would appear your argument is that the atomic structure of DNA is so vastly complex, that it must have been "mapped out ahead of time". But, going back to a previous comment, DNA didn't just magically appear out of the "primordial soup". It was the result of the big bang, the planets/stars forming from multiple elements, and those elements having physical and chemical interactions with one another to eventually form organic precursors/molecules then life (very high level and simplified, I know). Secondly, the discussion about how closely related we are to chimps, if anything, is evidence supporting evolution. Think about it...minor mutations within the genome (.1-.5%) that led to speciation. Lastly, if you read up on information entropy, it could also be argued that it actually supports the theories of abiogenesis and evolution as well (i.e. low fidelity enzymes making transcriptional errors leading to mutations in the genome - it correlates well with Chargaff's Rule and the purine/pyrimidine ratios).
 
Quote from gastropod:

My stance is that man cannot create DNA. It is that simple.

If 50 years from now a scientist creates DNA in a laboratory, does God cease to exist?

Does that scientist become God? Must he name his son Jesus?
 
Back
Top