Why everything you've been told about evolution is wrong

Quote from TGregg:

From the article:



Because the scientists missed a day and the bible explains it, therefore every single thing in the bible is true.

I've got a book (well, more a doc in Notepad than an actual book, but none-the-less) that explains the missing day as well, plus says y'all need to worship me, so ON YOUR KNEES! NOW!

Christ, if you needed any more evidence of weak minds, here it is.
More...

+1
 
what it really means in what I say from index piker:
I have no argument and nothing to contrubute.
But thank you for any opportunity for me to make pointless replies
More...

You're welcome.
 
One question I have - and I'm not trying to be facetious here - what evidence is there that god exists?

Now, before the creationists get all defensive, let me put it this way:

The evidence for evolution is on the table for everyone to form their own opinions (Darwin's work, etc.). Whether right or wrong, whether you believe in evolution or creationism, the evidence for the theory is available. Whether you buy that theory or not is irrelevant.

So, what is the comparable evidence for creationism? How can I reasonably form an opinion as to the merits of creationism, when I have no evidence?

This post is not meant to troll or flame - it's a serious question I'm asking creationists. Why should I buy into your theory?
 
Quote from Kassz007:

One question I have - and I'm not trying to be facetious here - what evidence is there that god exists?

Now, before the creationists get all defensive, let me put it this way:

The evidence for evolution is on the table for everyone to form their own opinions (Darwin's work, etc.). Whether right or wrong, whether you believe in evolution or creationism, the evidence for the theory is available. Whether you buy that theory or not is irrelevant.

So, what is the comparable evidence for creationism? How can I reasonably form an opinion as to the merits of creationism, when I have no evidence?

This post is not meant to troll or flame - it's a serious question I'm asking creationists. Why should I buy into your theory?
More...

Feelings are the evidence.
 
Quote from stu:

That’s not what I meant it seems you missed the point.


For some weird reason or other, there are those who want to put God before science. They often try to do so by pretending those scientific theories are merely articles of faith, whilst all the time those theories lead to new facts and endless discovery.

Without the knowledge in science gained from understanding Darwin and Evolution, there would be no modern day medicine.
Evolution is a fact . Biological Evolution is a fact.
All the detailed understanding of Evolutionary mechanisms are not understood.
Understanding is constantly improved by scientific theories, which can lead to new facts being discovered.Those theories will also include some facts.

' Why everything you've been told about evolution is wrong '....... because you can make up some wrong science about how science is wrong. ...Brilliant.
It sells some books and gets attention in a newspaper column. Mix in some real science and some attention grabbing titles like Darwin's Evolution and act like Darwin is wrong.

So why on earth would anyone want to do that other than sell books or get recognition or like creationists do, insist that their imaginary friend needs to be pushed in front of science ?

Those same people push pseudo-science as a means to suggest , or more usually insist , that things like Evolution can't be a fact because... guess what....their pseudo-science says otherwise.


As you can see in this thread, there are those who want to use any means to remove science from fact to create ignorance, just to say science is wrong and faith is not.
My question is, why do people want to encourage ignorance?


ps

"a potential modification to our understanding of evolution." is not science. It's book selling . The way evolution is understood... is science.
More...

ABSOLUTELY STUNNING POST STU! :D
 
Quote from Kassz007:

So, what is the comparable evidence for creationism? How can I reasonably form an opinion as to the merits of creationism, when I have no evidence?
More...

Prophecy
 
Quote from Kassz007:

One question I have - and I'm not trying to be facetious here - what evidence is there that god exists?

Now, before the creationists get all defensive, let me put it this way:

The evidence for evolution is on the table for everyone to form their own opinions (Darwin's work, etc.). Whether right or wrong, whether you believe in evolution or creationism, the evidence for the theory is available. Whether you buy that theory or not is irrelevant.

So, what is the comparable evidence for creationism? How can I reasonably form an opinion as to the merits of creationism, when I have no evidence?

This post is not meant to troll or flame - it's a serious question I'm asking creationists. Why should I buy into your theory?
More...


You may wish to understand that top cosmologists are now speculating there are almost unlimited multiple universes.
What is becoming more obvious to real scientists is that given the parameters limits in effect at the big bang you realize how astronomically unlikely it is that our universe is so finely tuned?

Physicists realize this is a massive problem for the "no God crowd." Now some of these top physicists are hanging their hat of the speculation that there could almost infinite universes.

In other words given that you are sitting with a perfectly ordered deck of cards... ( with trillions of cards in it.) do you think it is reasonable to say you were dealt that hand at random? Neither do some nobel prize winning physicists. They get around the implication of design (or fixed deck) by saying infinite hands have been dealt and someone had to hold the good hand.

---

second note -

We have seen Darwinists evolve the theory of evolution.
Its no longer completely random is it? They learned there is probably not enough time for all this to have evolved from the big bang or later from a primordial goo - so they have had to come up with directed evolution -- and now we are seeing that there must have been environmentally influenced evolution.

And as the article pointed out - survival of the fittest is an untested theory. No one is really trying to figure out who the fittest is whether the less fit died out.

of course the true believers will tell us it is all consistent with Darwins good book.

On the other side we have seen many believers hedge on Creation. In fact true believers like Stu can't stand that the Catholic church hedges by saying evolution is not inconsistent with God and the good book.

I sense at some point in time we will know God either caused evolution or evolution evolved God. I know where I would place my bet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top