Why everything you've been told about evolution is wrong

you know they call it obvious when it needs no explanation ..


(although .. first generation heredity stress is pretty interesting .. it seeeks to explain how the adaptation of life moves so quickly..)
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

The decline in real wages is not opinion, nor is the level of pollution, nor is the decline of the middle class, nor are the levels of corruption, etc., etc., etc....

Of course those aren't opinions. However when you don't provide any data it is an opinion when you say atheism is the cause of these facts.
 
Quote from FeenixRizin:

... are you saying that chickens are a product of their environment? Or is it their genes?

because, I really want to know
[/QUOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I do not know, I am not the scientist. I am thinking about the Swedish experiment. The baby chickens born with the gene expression to STRESS. But when they born, there is no stress for them. I am just thinking about that.
 
"Of course those aren't opinions."

Yes, they are data points...

"However when you don't provide any data it is an opinion when you say atheism is the cause of these facts."

The rise in scientific atheism leads and has lead to increase of the 7 deadly sins, which are on the rise concurrent with the rise of scientific atheism...this was also seen in Rome as they fell away from their previous moral center which was based in the concept of God and gods...

Atheists don't believe in sin or punishment thereof, so what is there to keep their hedonistic self centered impulses in check?

Nothing, the data confirms that...

You can deny the obvious all you like, or you could actually try to make a counter argument...

Quote from NeoRio1:

Of course those aren't opinions. However when you don't provide any data it is an opinion when you say atheism is the cause of these facts.
 
"But when they born, there is no stress for them."

Baseless claim.


Quote from trendlover:

Quote from FeenixRizin:

... are you saying that chickens are a product of their environment? Or is it their genes?

because, I really want to know
[/QUOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I do not know, I am not the scientist. I am thinking about the Swedish experiment. The baby chickens born with the gene expression to STRESS. But when they born, there is no stress for them. I am just thinking about that.
 
Quote from Trendlover
"But when they born, there is no stress for them."
---------------------------------------------------------------------

QUOTE]Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Baseless claim.
[/QUOTE
---------------------------------------------------------------------


With the experiment the chicken baby have no stress of light/day/night changed all the time. But the mom have that stress. That stress for to that mom is what maybe change her gene she pass to her baby.
 
Having hunger, and not knowing how to get food on your own is stress...

Quote from trendlover:

Quote from Trendlover
"But when they born, there is no stress for them."
---------------------------------------------------------------------

QUOTE]Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Baseless claim.
[/QUOTE
---------------------------------------------------------------------


With the experiment the chicken baby have no stress of light/day/night changed all the time. But the mom have that stress. That stress for to that mom is what maybe change her gene she pass to her baby.
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

The rise in scientific atheism leads and has lead to increase of the 7 deadly sins, which are on the rise concurrent with the rise of scientific atheism...this was also seen in Rome as they fell away from their previous moral center which was based in the concept of God and gods...

Atheists don't believe in sin or punishment thereof, so what is there to keep their hedonistic self centered impulses in check?

Nothing, the data confirms that...

You can deny the obvious all you like, or you could actually try to make a counter argument... [/B]

Almost all historians consider the moral decay argument to be too simplistic.

Constantine legalized Christianity in the fourth century and the empire fell in the fifth century... Besides that there was overexpansion and inflation, secret Germanic mercenaries in Roman legions, entrustment in barbarian mercenaries and an economy that depended on the looting of other territories.

What legitimate firms/organizations have come out with evidence that atheism has lead to an increase in the seven deadly sins?

What legitimate firms/organizations have come out with evidence that atheists are more hedonistic than theists?
 
want to make a point?

Traumatize chickens ....

thank you for that bit of ridiculousness

(In need of a federal grant?! you got it .. traumatize chckens... your road to riches, and deep understanding)
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

As scientific atheism has risen, America has declined in real wages, morality, divorce, increases in corruption in nearly every institution, and an overall decline in society...

That is the proof...

By scientific and statistical measure, America has declined (except levels of debt) in the overall quality of life with the rise of scientific atheism...

Morality? Crime is lower now than in the 70s, 80s, and 90s. We're less moral now than a hundred years ago? Ever read The Jungle?

Corruption? You think corruption in Washington and on Wall St. is worse now than in the 1920s?

Divorce, declining wages? All kinds of reasons for these - none of which have anything to do with an increase or decrease in religiosity. Take divorce: rising incomes and improvements in health care means women have 1-2 kids in their lifetimes instead of 8-10, which means they get jobs and do things besides raise children, which means divorce goes up.

70% of people in the Netherlands and Denmark do not believe in God. Are you saying the Netherlands and Denmark are dysfunctional societies?
 
Back
Top