Hawking writes a paragraph in his book. You copy part of it from a religious website and that is Hawking telling everyone how it is. The science from the scientist as you so ludicrously put it.Quote from jem:
You are a fool and a troll.
1. your statement does not mean anything but that Hawking speculates the constants could change in 1988.. now cite me to the page so I can look it up.
But the real question still is... does science have any proof the cosmological constant changes in our universe... or say any of the other constants mentioned by Rees? No... you are citing speculation to combat the conclusion of fine tuning.
Plus and this is really the point.....
2. I just gave you Hawkings writing from 2006. I not only cited to the paper... I linked to it. That is not cut and paste... that is the paper itself --- you lying troll. Try being truthful for once.
That is the science from the scientist. He tells you plainly our universe appears finely tuned. He speculates it could appear that way because of a multiverse. That is the bottom line. If you wish to call him religious be my guest.
But the part of the paragraph which inconveniently messes up the misdirection of the edit all of a sudden does not mean anything. No longer science from the scientist because of what he says..
Cite you to the page!!? Lol YOU gave the edited quote, the publisher and the page number. duh.
You quoted Stephen Hawking suggesting something he doesn't, by copying selectively edited words that theist websites lifted from a paragraph in his book.
You have form for doing these things from all over the place. You even deny the spoken words in videos that you post .
That is sufficient reason to exhibit how nothing you post is reliable.
Taking Stephen Hawkings words as unquestionable when they fit with your false choice between so called fine tuning or multiverse, ignoring every other physicist, the science itself, and Stephen Hawking too when they don't fit, is no more than the brainless theistic pick and choose way to ignorance.