Quote from marketsurfer:
The facts are TA does not work. Yes, it seems to work at times, but this is very deceiving. TA works until it doesn't, if that makes better sense.
TA is non quantifiable, the patterns are not definable in a scientific manner, and there is no evidence ( other than anecdotal) that it works.
TA is the opiate of the trading masses, it's an easy fix--just follow price mantra leads most to an early financial death or disallusion.
this is from an ex TA practioner.
Regards,
Surf
Quote from Grob109:
there are two things involved with surfers comments.
TA and surfer.
Proflogic commented on the TA part.
There is a surfer part too. I do not track surfer any more.
To make money a trader connects and has a relationship to the markets.
Most traders never get to see the markets in the first place. There are lots of reasons for this.
Were a trader to be able to see the markets, then there has to be a division of responsibilities. And it is important to get this right and it is important to not abrogate roles nor step over a line to ursurp.
To carry out the relationship takes a routine and the routine is based upon a vast array of knowledge, skills and experience.
Most often traders with long low performance track records are just repeating their initial experiences while not advancing in skills and knowledge.
Most traders never establish a routine as part of their experience. Those that do, make a point of speaking in detail about their routine.
I look for four elements in those routines proferring by these types of traders. I look for the sequence (over time) in which they iteratively refine their routine elements.
The body of knowledge and skills that relate to TA is found in two of the four parts of superior trader's routines. TA is found in all of these trader's commentaries without exception. It is also true that fundamental analysis (FA) is present in these commentaries.
People learning to trade may only get so far in the process. One of the markers is whether or not they get things straight in FA and TA. If they do not, then there is a gradual degredation as they further and further mess things up. There is a concurrent hardening of their viewpoints regarding what they have tossed on their personal junk pile. Rarely does a person go to the junk pile and resurect something he has made a mistake in learning about. It is a one way street.
Learning correctly and knowing what you know is correct is a challenge in trading, However, there is an unusual opportunity to take advantage of an available process for doing selfchecking as a quality assurance effort.* Those who are repeating their initial experiences ad nauseum do not use self checking processes of any kind. There is a common reason for this. Their experiencing of markets and trading does not invlove any regular routine. A routine is absent.
When you read people who "talk" about "reaction", you are experiencing with them their lack of a routine. The line in the sand between being reactive and pro active is well defined and has a strong set of critria for assessing which side of the line the given trader operates on. It is important to be able to assess how long ago in the past the trader crossed the line as part of his progress. The line is crossed going in only one direction it turns out.
So TA appears in only two places in the parts of routines excellent traders follow. first it is coupled with the ont part of the routine that involves the senses: the monitoring of the market. The negative emotions associated with the market are in direct proportion to WHAT the trader is NOT seeing. The more that is not seen the broader the range of NEGATIVE emotions. This is the basis of proflogic comments on why people drop TA from their monitoring. If a person isn't able to even see the market, he isn't going to be able to use TA and he is going to have a braod range of negative emotions associated with the markets.
If a person monitors and gains the ability to collect data sets only as a peart of his routine, then the emotional component becomes most closely associated with HAVING GOTTEN A SUFFICIENT (COMPLETE) DATA SET FOR THE NEXT STEP OF HIS ROUTINE. What does it feel like, emotionally to have a complete or sufficient data set as you turn away from the screen to do the rest of your routine (put on a blind fold accasionally to stop sensing while you do it). The emotions are positive ones; ones associated with accomplishing the m0onitoring task.
Look at a person who has put TA on the junk pile. Does he have a chance to perform as do those who have TA and use it totally to get complete data sets? A common example in ET is the person who does not do trendlines or if he does he doesn't do channels by using a parallel line (remember dbphoenix who would not draw channels and could not see exits on the left line; he would rather believe a BO of the trendline was his supply demand model). Think of those who feel it is only possible to draw a tendline after the fact and channels after the fact.(they are drawn and projected from two consecutive bars ASAP as it turns out. Imagine using a platform for charts that does not let you have future blank space to project into on the right side of the chart. You can't do TA without having the future in the picture. All of this can lead to negative emotions while trading in a handicapped manner.
TA allows a person to successfully collect sufficient data sets that are conveyed to the second part of the routine: analysis.
analysis is conducted blindfolded so to speak while your chair is rotated to a position opposite and away from the screen. Put your log on a table that is behind you when you are monitoring. Turn to it to put down the results of your analysis. Fill in the observations after you have filled in the analysis column. Or do it the other way round.
How does TA fit into analysis? It is where the conclusion set comes from. analysis takes a data set and paris it with the conclusion that fit the data set. A trader has a finite set of monitoring data sets and he has a finitie set of conclusions that can be associated with data sets. Leaf back though your logs and hilight them now. Use yellow for conclusions and heliotrope for data sets. I green ball point number the conclusions from 1 to n. In red bal point number, correspondingly, the data set that corresponds to the appropriately numbered conclusion. When done you are an advanced beginner.
Load the two lists in to excel. You now have an automatic lookup table. Notice the TA as it appears on each list.
Do you have too much TA or too little. Do you notice that the leading TA indicators are the best ones for the best and more important conclusions?
My lists are in my sports memory at this point in time. I don't use them in my personal RAM anymore.
It turns out TA is the science of trading. What is the liberal arts of trading. LOL, we all know he answer to that one.
TA is left behind for the rest of the routine. Mark the log with green hiliter for the decisions that relate to the conclusions of analysis. You see five elements in the green hiliter set. None of them say anything TAwise. There is no TA in decisions. It would be OT to continue to go through the routine further as we see.
What is in the data dests of the "reactors". Usually single elements of date. "I just saw______.(fill in the blank. Is there ever a conclusion that can be draw from a single data element? No there isn't. are any of these things that are seen related to TA? Nope, they are not. There is NOTHING in TA that deals with a single element of data. who uses these single elements that have no conclusions? People who see a single element and skip analysis and go directly to decion making. What is the name of this set of traders? They are called losers, generally speaking.
All losers do not use TA. Not using TA is THE common characteristic of losers if there is one.
*The routine is self checking once it is begun. as items are added to the data sets set corresponding conclusions are added to the conclusion set.
Quote from yoohoo:
This is now the magic mushroom post. Grob and I answered the first post - the meanderings of a madman at full moon. Now the first post has changed completely into something resembling intelligence.
Or were Grob and I eating something with an interesting mushroom content last night?
How do you delete your first post and change it completely?