Quote from traderchi128:
The best part is he uses Vic "I blew up my fund twice doing the same thing" Neiderhoffer as an example. Vic probably used price drivers....price drivers that drove his fund into the ground....TWICE!!!!
Vic is a failed trader who loves to rip on others who suceeded in something he couldn't do.......
See the similarities?
Yeah, maybe Neiderhoffer missed a couple of tests on that "volatility edge".
I just find the whole "Oh, that's already been done by so-and-so" annoying. Primarily because the number of ways in which an edge can be discovered is, for practical purposes, nearly infinite. The scope for creativity is open-ended in the markets. Clearly, you don't want to base your trades on spurious correlations, but the idea that, for example, there's only one volatility-based edge in the entire universe is ludicrous and no serious person would ever think that, much less say it out loud.
And, surf, FYI, even your buddy Aronson has a volatility-based edge he wrote up on his website for EBTA. I guess your extensive knowledge of the literature on volatility didn't extend that far.
