"Can not be shown or proven" is entirely false, I could do so but risk revealing my methodology all for what, satisfying your curiosity?
The mkt lines up the trades and creates the "biases", I just interpret the signals and when alignment occurs on my time frames, I take the trade. All entries are 100% non random and objective. Exits can be objective but most of the time I use subjectivity with regards to time of day, whether its a slow summer trading day etc.
The mkt lines up the trades and creates the "biases", I just interpret the signals and when alignment occurs on my time frames, I take the trade. All entries are 100% non random and objective. Exits can be objective but most of the time I use subjectivity with regards to time of day, whether its a slow summer trading day etc.
Quote from marketsurfer:
Yes, I have no argument with intuitive chart reading--- if you have that talent, more profits to you. My argument is with TA users who think they are quantifiably increasing the odds on an entry. This can not be shown or proven-- therefore, its chart interpretation via skill, talent, intuition whatever.... If this was just admitted, I can't argue with it.