Probably not too many since the leverage was extremely high because they were trading firm capital.I wonder how many prop traders leave after accumulating some cash to trade on their own?
Probably not too many since the leverage was extremely high because they were trading firm capital.I wonder how many prop traders leave after accumulating some cash to trade on their own?
%%Same reasons: No edge, lazy, delusional, overtrading and no hunger for the game
so what i'm getting here is that the main difference between good vs bad traders are mostly the same between prop firms and traders. And yes, I do realize that there are a lot of predatory prop shops who aren't even necessarily profitable from trading. What are some red flags to beware of, paying for education, high desk fee, and margin requirements?
I recall reading SMB's blog which indicated that 95% of people who apply never get an interview/seat with them, which made me think there's more to it.
Another thing I can see is psychological pressure of having to perform in order to simply pay the bills in the beginning. That can cause one to chase moves and look for suboptimal opportunities. Can someone who's actually worked in prop trading comment on that?
From my experience, beginning prop traders either got paid a small salary or have their living expenses covered otherwise, so I don't think the pressure you are talking about was an issue. There was the pressure of having to perform to be able to stay on. I.e., if after say, six months, you are still a marginal or losing trader, the firm might want to kick you out.
and what separates the marginal/losing traders from the winning ones from your observation?
As for the salary thing, I asked about that in the other thread I made and the overwhelming response I got was something along the lines of "why should you expect a salary". Maybe the industry has changed since you were in it. It makes sense to me that as you're bringing on newer traders, to give them some stipend so they can focus on trading, and not worry about how they're going to pay for food/rent. But that doesn't seem to be the case in the firms I've seen. Maybe I'm not looking at the right places and you can suggest some places that are worth looking at.
You have zero comprehension of the business model of a prop shop. With a 90%+ washout rate paying a stipend would make the business a guaranteed loser.It makes sense to me that as you're bringing on newer traders, to give them some stipend so they can focus on trading, and not worry about how they're going to pay for food/rent