My experience is this: when I direct a Relative Buy or Sell Order with any offset to Island during Regular Trading Hours, I get a message from IB telling me that Relative Orders are only accepted by Island during Regular Trading Hours, which, of course, is exactly when I'm placing them! Unbelievable, until one accepts the fact that, at IB, nothing's truly unbelievable.
Thus, while IB claims to have made changes to their Relative, Pegged-to-Midpoint, and Pegged-to-Primary orders so they finally conform to the NASDAQ protocols for these orders that were approved by the SEC, after years of perverting these protocols to their advantage and their customers' disadvantage, my experience tells me that they've so far effectively made it impossible to actually access the NASDAQ protocols.
I brought this situation to IB's attention 10 days ago, and still have heard absolutely nothing from them, even though it was brought to a supervisor's attention. Again, unbelievable, with the same qualification as above.
So that everyone will know, it's always been possible with IB Relative Orders to have the orders rollback, so long as no offset was specified.
Maybe, someone from IB will respond in some meaningful way and get these problems addressed. Maybe not...
Thus, while IB claims to have made changes to their Relative, Pegged-to-Midpoint, and Pegged-to-Primary orders so they finally conform to the NASDAQ protocols for these orders that were approved by the SEC, after years of perverting these protocols to their advantage and their customers' disadvantage, my experience tells me that they've so far effectively made it impossible to actually access the NASDAQ protocols.
I brought this situation to IB's attention 10 days ago, and still have heard absolutely nothing from them, even though it was brought to a supervisor's attention. Again, unbelievable, with the same qualification as above.
So that everyone will know, it's always been possible with IB Relative Orders to have the orders rollback, so long as no offset was specified.
Maybe, someone from IB will respond in some meaningful way and get these problems addressed. Maybe not...
Quote from giggollo:
I would like to thank DAV and others for working on this issue. To summarize, they have recently introduced 2 new order types: a "relative passive" order which allows "negative offsets" and more importantly a true ISLAND relative order which rolls back if the NBBO becomes less aggressive. I have personally tested the latter native Island pegged order and found it to work properly; it follows the NBBO and rolls back if the NBBO becomes less aggressive. The TWS user guide has also been updated to reflect the fact that the native, directed Island pegged order rolls back:
"** Orders with a positive offset that are directed to Island will move up and down with the market.
Orders with a "0" offset are submitted as limit orders at the best bid/ask and will move up and down with the market to continue to match the inside quote."
http://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/trading/orders/relative.php?ib_entity=llc
I invite others on this thread to test for themselves and report back their findings. Note that you must specify the destination to be directed to ISLAND to send the native ISLAND pegged order that rolls back; if you specify SMART as destination you will be getting the old IB-simulated relative order which does not roll back.