While more correlated than FXI, CAF still lags the relative performance of the SSEC by about half:Quote from Daal:
use CAF
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=000001.SS&t=6m&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=caf
While more correlated than FXI, CAF still lags the relative performance of the SSEC by about half:Quote from Daal:
use CAF
Quote from richardyu301:
Most of the shares in China market are not floated, but the government has decided to float more of them to make the stock market really more market-oriented.
In 2008, 135B shares will become floated (RMB2-3T).
Here is a table showing how many shares become floated everyday.
http://www.zhicheng.com/dxf/200808.html
China market capitalization is just RMB15-16T so the impact is huge.
Quote from gangof4:
the interesting thing to me is the complete lack of volume. if you look @ the volume on the way up, it was at least 2x, and many days, 4x what the volume has been thru most of the decline. volume spikes really only come on up days too. never really witnessed anything like this.
one would think that we would have to see some sort of explosion in volume over some days of ugly declines before any lasting bottom can be put in. that said, i find it incredible the magnitude of the decline without any volume, so the whole thing kinda confounds me. you'd think there would be some panic selling (and requisite volume) given how far it has dropped from the bubblicious high. the only thing that makes sense about it is that, given the lack of volume, we continue to bleed lower.