You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Why do people use Volume, Range and Tic charts?
- Thread starter fearless9
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Quote from ProfLogic:
If you read this entire thread I go into detail on how I use them.
I just did and I think is one of the most educated threads I have ever see on ET. I was curious as RedDuke mentioned he uses CCI wondering if there's any particular Vol settings that works for him using CCI.. My question is addressed to you as well, proflogic.
Not every charting package has ergodic indicator..
I am always open to new things and this thread in particular has my attention
Quote from ProfLogic:
I agree but Wood Man is so stubborn. Constant Volume Bars are as pure as one will get to viewing price and that is supposedly Woodie's whole focus.
I use the Ergodic which is a Momentum Indicator as well. I personally like the smoothness verses the CCI.
PrL
would you please let me know where to get the TS-Ergodic-Formula since my software may have it as well however, under a completely different name (choice
of ~ 250 indic.).
Either I find it there or get somebody to
"translate" it.
Thank you.
Charly
Quote from Charly:
PrL
would you please let me know where to get the TS-Ergodic-Formula since my software may have it as well however, under a completely different name (choice
of ~ 250 indic.).
Either I find it there or get somebody to
"translate" it.
Thank you.
Charly
True Strength Index or TSI
Ergodic (some misspelled as Ergotic)
(Not to be confused with Ergodic candle which uses OHLC)
Some time back I found conflicting information regarding whether the TSI and Ergodic are identical, although many people refer to both as one and the same. Some say the TSI is two EMA's with a smoothing signal line (three inputs), and others say the Ergodic has three EMA's with a signal line (four inputs). Perhaps someone who has Blau's book can clear this up.
The code for both formulas are easily found through Google. I'm not sure which is the actual real McCoy.
st
On page 18 of my copy of Blau's book, the following definition is given:
Ergodic(Close,r) = TSI(Close,r,5)
SignalLine(Close,r) = EMA(TSI(Close,r,5),5)
Ergodic(Close,r) = TSI(Close,r,5)
SignalLine(Close,r) = EMA(TSI(Close,r,5),5)
Quote from originalskunk:
On page 18 of my copy of Blau's book, the following definition is given:
Ergodic(Close,r) = TSI(Close,r,5)
SignalLine(Close,r) = EMA(TSI(Close,r,5),5)
Thanks for the follow up. To clarify, what you posted is the Ergodic, and I notice it uses the TSI within the formula. Therefore, what is the code for the TSI. IOW, if the Ergodic is a function of the TSI, what is the TSI? Or am I not understanding this correctly and they are one and the same?
st
TSI(Close,r,s) = 100 * EMA(EMA(mtm,r),s) / EMA(EMA(|mtm|,r),s)
Quote from Charly:
PrL
would you please let me know where to get the TS-Ergodic-Formula since my software may have it as well however, under a completely different name (choice
of ~ 250 indic.).
Either I find it there or get somebody to
"translate" it.
Thank you.
Charly
Do you mean the Tradestation Ergodic? If yes, which version do you have?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.