With number 3 being the most important. It is in fact, the only true edge in trading.Basically, it goes like this:
1. Study. (This can take from 1 to 10 years.)
2. Entry.
3. Money management.
4. Exit.
5. Repeat 2-4.
With number 3 being the most important. It is in fact, the only true edge in trading.Basically, it goes like this:
1. Study. (This can take from 1 to 10 years.)
2. Entry.
3. Money management.
4. Exit.
5. Repeat 2-4.
Because retail traders are not investors and generally don't have the capital to trade fundamentals and hold through huge drawdowns before their thesis is finally proved correct. (Read "The Big Short" for an example of fundamental analysis being spot on, but a year or two too early.) For short term trading and day trading, NOTHING beats technical analysis for providing a framework of low risk, high reward setups.
99% of retail traders don't lose because they use technical analysis and/or indicators; they lose because they have no idea how to conduct statistical analyses (or no work ethic to do so) and/or no idea how to think in terms of probabilities once a statistically sound plan is developed.
Correlation does not equal causation.
More traders are in TA because FA has a big lag and could be used for long-term trading. You cannot use FA in intraday trading where many traders turn trading into a gambling by trying to catch several points. On the other hand TA helps those traders to see parent dominant trend and build trading strategy accordingly, calculate expected profit and stop loss levels, define points where intraday trend is sensitive to changes and etc. People use TA to develop system and trade them.
At the same time, you cannot use TA in long-term analysis. You may use some indicators to see when market is predisposed to reverse its long-term trend. Yet, it will be just a current sentiment that could become completely opposite in a week and or a month. TA will not tell you where the market will be in 1 or 2 years. Whoever does it is just trying to sell something.
I guess the conflict between those who believe in TA and those who believe in FA is simply imaginary. Each analysis has its cons and pros. Simply put, most of FA traders are long-term investors and they just do not want to understand the TA traders who mostly trade in short-term. At the same TA traders do not want to understand FA traders.
Every tool has it purpose and there is no straight answer on what is better, TA or FA. Both, TA and FA use past data to predict possible future trend development which in both cases is not guaranteed.
One should always assume that trend will occur. Markets are always trending on some time frame. There is no such thing as range trading. Kramer frutes will typically have difficulty with this concept.The point you assume is that there is trend development. TA assumes that and is a study in how to get on the bandwagon. However, there are the random walkers and other models such as those that price options that don't assume there is a trend.
One should always assume that trend will occur. Markets are always trending on some time frame. There is no such thing as range trading. Kramer frutes will typically have difficulty with this concept.
Markets only trend. They do not range.
