Quote from oilfxpro:
The important thing was having a 50 % system , sooner or later it will revert to mean.The problem of not reverting to mean arises with some of the crappy systems.
It might not with the next 100 trades , but surely with the next 200 , or 300 trades.
The idea is to keep increasing bet size, bets don't have to be double , they can be increased and decreased in different percentages , and various break-even exits can be implemented , eliminating the need for increasing bet sizes.
A clever money management system can beat random markets.
That's not trading. That's something akin to martingale-ing. And the operator needs a huge account for that to yield an acceptable return. 200 trades is a long time to wait before recouping losses. Returns are minimal. What? 30-50% a year? If that?
