Quote from austinp:
<i>"... there's a lot more, but I'll stop there, I have to take a nap before the open"</i>
Good Lord, <b>JJ</b>... what're you doing up at those hours? Leave those foreign markets alone and get to bed. Plenty of money to be made in our eminis when they open (laugh).
Jack and followers don't have a system... they teach a general methodology, which is the parent of system(s). Once a trader takes some methodology parameters and assigns them defined, black & white rules, the methodology then spawns a system.
The more simple a method is, the easier one can create a system from it. More complex methods will certainly show greater potential profits available, but the chasm between <i>potential</i> profits in hindsight and <i>realized</i> profits in a real-money account can be wider than the Grand Canyon.
Jack, Spyder and gang are to be commended for working hard at trying to make a difference for others. I would opine that trying to catch the major intraday swings instead of every wiggle on a chart would be much easier in reality. Perhaps channeling the major reference points instead of every bar on an ES chart would have newbies grasp the picture far faster.
Trendline channels in harmony with pure points of reference will make money. In yesterday's case, seeking buy signals in the ES following its clean bounce from S2 would have been a no-brainer. Forget trying to short any weak little blips... that only clouds the emotional judgement of most traders.
It is emotionally impossible for most traders to take 20 - 30 - 50 - 100 turns intraday AND remain effective for long periods of time. It's also a waste of time. Just measure the market, read the tape and take trade signals in direction of existing market strength, be it up or down. Channeling the major swing points and/or using some other key price measures will easily accomplish that.
At the very least, Jack, Spyder & gang are trying to offer solutions in their own way. Nothing is this entire forum is less useful than posters who only ever denigrate, bitch and complain without likewise offering solutions to their complaints.
DING DING DING!!!
We got a winner.
Current presentation of SCT is too complicated (read:CONFUSING) for newbies.
Start simple then add incremental layers of refinement.
Focus on the big time frame first, then slowly work down through successive time frames applying the same channeling technique to each newly created sub channel.
What's being taught now is the most advanced form of channeling (seamless continual trading) which in reality, should be presented last as it demands the highest attention to detail and contextual experience. Very difficult for a green horn to cut their teeth on - let alone, get a 'feel' for what the strat is all about.
I'm sure there's a reason for this and I'd be quite curious to know what that is....
Either way - a big and hearty THANK YOU to jack and his a team for taking the time. For without which I would have obliviously strolled on by without paying a second thought
Thanks guys.
