Why do folks reveal Profitable Strategies, are they NUTS?

[T280]

Quote from nzbryant:



1. If any of you have added as much value as Jack I will eat my shirt.

You'll probably need sauce with that shirt

 

[T280]

Quote from nzbryant:

Nor will you.

Oh I'll see it... I'll be the good looking one with all the money

 

[T280]

Quote from Spydertrader:

I See. So you never actually met either person face to face, and your "no doubt" post above was simply an example of you talking out your ass. Thanks for clearing up the matter.

If the old man bothers you that much, why not add him to your ignore list? Two clicks to seal the deal, and you'd never have to read his long posts again.

- Spydertrader

Why aren't you defending the people he ridicules Spy?... because you are his cabana boy.... thats why you can't be taken seriously

 

[Soon2Bgreat]

Quote from traderdragon2:

No, its perfectly valid.

It shows that money management cannot give edge against pure randomness with a house edge.

A martingale system cannot beat a negative expectancy game such as roulette in the real world because that would require an infinite bank roll

Sheesh, you mean you don't trade with an infinite bankroll, must be tough

I see what you mean, should've thought twice before posting, lol.

 

[Tums]

are saxon22 and T28 the same person?
they do talk alike.

 

[T280]

Quote from Tums:

are saxon22 and T28 the same person?

Hope not or I'd have myself on ignore


and get a real nickname Tums

 

[T280]

Quote from jack hershey:

lol

Be sure and take your teeth out before doing that Jack... we wouldn't want you to choke on them

 

[Spydertrader]

Quote from T280:

Why aren't you defending the people he ridicules Spy?...

When noticed and where warranted, I have. Feel free to look in the Futures Thread to locate one recent example.

Why haven't you chosen to use the ignore function again?

- Spydertrader

 

[T280]

Quote from Spydertrader:

When noticed and where warranted, I have. Feel free to look in the Futures Thread to locate one recent example.

Why haven't you chosen to use the ignore function again?

- Spydertrader

Well you haven't noticed much... and I'm not surprised... don't feign objectivity when you are running his journals

 

[eusdaiki]

How quickly a perfectly interesting thread turns to a flame...


that sucks...


The market has a difference from the roulette. The market won't describe a standard distribution, and therefore is not random.

***************************


Any price quote you get for a security at a given time is an equilibrium at that time given the available information [supply and demand had to agree at that price]. when you go from determining the price of an asset with a few points of equilibrium per monetary unit [say a dollar] to pricing it with many points of equilibrium on the same monetary unit.
In order for this to work you need to have much higher volumes, so that all those prices will remain liquid. Therefore you have many more buyers and sellers casting their votes [1 share = 1 vote] on the price of the stock and agreeing on the equilibrium price.
And therefore the equilibrium price can be considered to be more accurate.