It's easy to make unproven assertions, or assertions that rely on a conspiracy theory. This particular assertion is as sensible as saying that "trader" is synonymous with "crook" or that "surgeon" is synonymous with "crook". If you read through ET and other sites on the net there are many examples of traders convicted for defrauding people who entrusted them with money. Should we take this weak anecdotal evidence as proof that all traders are therefore crooks? That would be the logic of the playground - or of the lynch mob - not of objective observers. I'd hope we can rise above that level.Quote from cc2trade:
Very eloquently put...
âAnalystâ is synonymous with âcrookâ
Alternatively we can follow a time-honoured ET tradition and just sling abuse at each other.
Suss