Quote from ssrrkk:
nodoji, I echo the thanks for the great example. I also would have thought that in keeping with the "no prediction" mindset, one might have shorted at the failed breakout, then seeing the reversal failing @10:45, get out, then next seeing that the resistance is breached @11:00 one might go long at that point. Wouldn't that be less "predictive" than going long at 108.87? it could have easily bounced again for a triple confirmation of the top too...
Oh I have no problem with several potential shorting opportunities during the run up; I just happened not to trade them, choosing to trade only to the long side until that final failed breakout near the pit close (my charts are two hours behind EST, by the way). I do take counter-trend short trades, but frankly they tend to be usually tedious and often result in break even or losing trades.
Even the hypothetical counter-trend trader's initial short at the close of the shooting star bar in the first chart I posted wasn't a "wrong" trade. What was "wrong" in my example was not exiting the short when price tells you the move up isn't over, and better yet, switching to a long position to cover the cost of the losing short trade. What was "wrong" was trading with no stop and averaging down based on an opinion that price was "due" to reverse.
If the hypothetical trader in my example stopped out of the short trades properly when trading against a well-defined uptrend (when the high of a previous 5-min bar broke), the end result would've been a .10 loss on the first trade, and a collective .06 loss on the three-car average down that followed. This is a total loss of $160 plus commissions instead of the $3200 loss incurred by holding stubbornly against the price action and puking out the position at a very bad level.
Going long at 108.87 was based on 1-min price action. I missed the earlier long entry on that trade.