Quote from cornixforex:
Don't remember where exactly I read it, but someone compared trading to weight loss. Everybody knows what to do to lose weight, but only a few from every hundred succeed at it.
Same here. Simple technically, very hard emotionally.
Emotions are the weak link of us human beings in relation to activities which demand hard discipline.
Somehow I don't believe that's the whole story. There are a lot of talented programmers in the world. If it's a matter of automation, then a lot of those programmers will be rich. Among automated traders, perhaps still only 5% win.
Just to add another wrinkle: 5% is the threshold most often used to determine if something is due to a real effect, or if it is due to chance or luck. Most statistical tests use p=0.05 as the threshold. So the fact that only 5% of traders make it is somewhat coincidental, kind of suggests that most of those 5% just got lucky. Of course, we know of certain legendary cases where a trader is too consistent over the years to have gotten lucky. So it is clearly not all luck, but may be a good percentage of the 5% is also luck.
The mystery is, if the rules are simple, why is it that the majority still loses? Some say it's because most of the 95% are degenerates. I believe to some extent that's true. What we need is a stratification of this statistic, for example:
overall % successful traders: 5%
% successful traders who completed high school: x %
% successful traders who completed college: x %
% successful traders who hold a post-graduate degree: x %
% successful traders who worked with a successful mentor: x %
% successful prop traders: x %
% successful professional institutional traders: x %
% successful traders who do it full time: x %
% successful traders who do it part time: x %
% successful traders who have at least 5 years experience: x %
% successful traders who were successful in a team sport: x %
% successful traders who were successful in another technical career: x %
% successful traders who has work experience in finance: x %