PBS get about 85% of its funding from non-government sources. NPR gets 98% of its funding from non-government sources.
Among the industrialized nations the U.S. compares itself to, the U.S. spends by far the least amount of government resources on public broadcasting and the arts. If instead of buying 2500 F-35 fighter jets we bought 2499, one less, we could double our public funding on the arts via the National endowment for the Arts. That's how little the U.S. spends on the arts!
If instead of buying 2500 jet fighters we bought 2000 instead, we could double our public funding on the arts for several centuries! Which purchase would be the better long term investment: five hundred additional F-35 fighter jets on top of two-thousand others, or a doubling of funding for the Arts for several centuries?
Actually I would prefer we buy more military hardware. At least it has a use, unlike most of what passes for "art", which generally is offensive to most people and/or highly politicized crap. I feel the same way about the vast majority of government-sponsored "research" in non-scientific fields. Do we really need more grants to fund some leftwing academics to ponder the question of why Juwanzo can't read? Or why elderly lesbians have trouble getting dates?