Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
"I'm surprised that I don't have more co-sponsors for my Sanctity of Life Act. It removes the jurisdiction from the federal courts & allows the states to pass protection to the unborn. Instead of waiting years for a Constitutional Amendment, this would happen immediately, by majority vote in the Congress and a president's signature. It's a much easier way to accomplish this, by following what our Constitution directs us. Instead of new laws, let's just use what we have & pass this type of legislation."
You notice that Paul isn't against a Constitutional Amendment banning abortion...he is rather indicating that such effort will take too long, in effect saying at least at the state level in the red states they could start banning abortions sooner.
The guy is anti abortion, plain and simple.
Can't you see what an opportunist this guy really is? Can't you guys see the game he is actually playing?
He claims to be for term limits on principle, but since none exist, he isn't going to follow that principle for himself by volunteering to stick to his own principle of term limits, he continues to run.
WTF?
The earmark situation is his way of saying "I am against it, but as long as it exists I am going to use it."
That is a principled position?
He will take money from anyone if it advances his campaign, yet claims to be against the position of the people he is taking money from?
He voted yes on a bill to on an amendment banning adoptions in District of Columbia by gays or other individuals who are not related by blood or marriage.
That is Liberty for gays? Not being able to adopt children?
This guy is bad news...Libertarianism and Christianity don't actually mix all that well, as you get promotion of Liberty that is seen as "moral" from a Christian point of view and prohibitions on those who don't always agree with the right wing Christian point of view...
