Quote from Maverick74:
That is not what I said. Man, you are not making my University of Florida education look good here Joey. Your reading skills leave a lot to be desired, as does your spelling. I simply said, the numbers I have support my assertion that a larger % of traders who trade remote are not profitable compared to office traders. This is a fact. This fact is backed up by anecdotal evidence. You are pulling shit out of your ass.
Think about it for a second will ya? If you trade in an office, how can you stay there if you are not taking home checks? How can you afford to? It's not rocket science. How are you going to pay your desk fee. How are you going to support yourself with no income. It's common sense. The guys in offices tend to be the survivors, the guys who have made it.
Quote from Maverick74:
Nope. You are not understanding the relationship between trader and prop firm. Did you pick up the latest issue of Trader Monthly? They have the new 30 under 30 issue out. The up and coming superstars. Take a guess how many of those guys trade at home alone? Just take a wild guess? Pick a number, any number. Yeah, sure you can eek out a teacher's salary staying at home trading your small account. Most traders aspire to more. Most traders want to take their talent to the highest level. That is freedom my friend. And it ain't going to come sitting in mom's basement in your underwear making just enough money to cover your Honda Accords car payment. LOL.
Quote from ratboy88:
what they are avoiding telling you is that pennies caused the closing of the offices. not saying that remote isn't a good thing. but most new traders starting out fail without being around successful traders. as the automated programs became more and more prevalent, the profits form "scalping" diminished. "jessica" is the smartest person on this thread because "she" smelled something fishy and "she" was right. if the scalping money was still being made they would not have closed almost all of the offices. do you people have any idea what type of losses they took on those offices?
the sec supposedly came up with the move to decimals to "help the little guy" and gave the nyse the choice between nickles and pennies. the nyse chose pennies. since then the big banks (like goldman) have captured the majority of volume on the nyse. trust me if bright could go back to the "glory" days they would in a heart beat. this business is extremely difficult when first starting out and there is no substitute for being around successful veterans.
Quote from SteveD:
The Trader's Magazine group had one thing in common:
They all were EMPLOYED by a large firm.
They all traded OTHER PEOPLES MONEY. Give me a break.
Show me a trader that saved up $250,000 of his hard earned money and now wants to learn how to trade.
Someone else quoted statistics using a group at a bar as his source, LOL.
If an experienced trader from Goldman opened a shop and wanted to teach/mentor young traders do you realize how many threads would be started on ET:
"If he really was good he wouldn't be teaching" type of BS.
Both methods, home or office, are OK. Whatever suits you.
That is why Baskin-Robbins has 31 flavors, LOL
SteveD
Quote from Maverick74:
That is not what I said. Man, you are not making my University of Florida education look good here Joey. Your reading skills leave a lot to be desired, as does your spelling. I simply said, the numbers I have support my assertion that a larger % of traders who trade remote are not profitable compared to office traders. This is a fact. This fact is backed up by anecdotal evidence. You are pulling shit out of your ass.
Think about it for a second will ya? If you trade in an office, how can you stay there if you are not taking home checks? How can you afford to? It's not rocket science. How are you going to pay your desk fee. How are you going to support yourself with no income. It's common sense. The guys in offices tend to be the survivors, the guys who have made it.
Quote from Maverick74:
Let me further explain here. The reason why so many hedge funds are highly concentrated in south FL and Connecticut and CA is not because of the weather, or they want to be away from NY, it's because hedge funds tend to set up shop around pockets of wealth. If you are going to raise money for your hedge fund you are not going to set up shop in North Carolina, although the weather is beautiful down there. There also aren't many hedge funds in Seattle despite the nicer weather. So your argument is a little lacking. Hedge funds moved out of manhattan because NY is mostly a sell side town, not a buyside. They are not moving to "interesting places". LOL.
BTW, I live in Chicago, and I would say 80% of all the CTA's in the world live and trade here. And guess what, it's not because of our beautiful weather. LOL.

Quote from ozarka:
I don't think that is what he was implying. I think the point was, you have a higher chance of profitability in a group and the data he specfied was to support that statement.
This statement was the same as what Cash said and what others said. As a whole, you have better odds in an office versus going remote. This of course is dependent on who is in that group.