Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - In One Pie Chart

Quote from Free Thinker:

13,950 articles 24 of the 13,950 articles, 0.17% or 1 in 581, clearly reject global warming or endorse a cause other than CO2 emissions for observed warming.


http://richarddawkins.net/news_arti...fic-credibility-in-one-pie-chart#.ULKDcIc8DTo
More...

So I guess you would have been a flat earther when the majority believed the earth to be flat. You would have cheered with the masses as Galileo was said to be a heretic when he claimed the earth was not the center of the universe. You would have owned many slaves because the majority thought it to be just fine to do so.
You and they have zero evidence that CO2 is the primary driver. You and they cannot explain the why and the how of all previous climate changes that ocurred prior to the evil man and his combustion engine. Not to worry. The mob needs no evidence, just belief. Undying religous belief of the kool-aid drinkers. You would have fit right in at Jonestown.
 
Quote from CaptainObvious:

So I guess you would have been a flat earther when the majority believed the earth to be flat. You would have cheered with the masses as Galileo was said to be a heretic when he claimed the earth was not the center of the universe. You would have owned many slaves because the majority thought it to be just fine to do so.
You and they have zero evidence that CO2 is the primary driver. You and they cannot explain the why and the how of all previous climate changes that ocurred prior to the evil man and his combustion engine. Not to worry. The mob needs no evidence, just belief. Undying religous belief of the kool-aid drinkers. You would have fit right in at Jonestown.
More...
these are scientific articles. do you have any concept of how science works?
the flat earth was a religious concept that people would not let go of because the bible describes the earth as flat.. it was the scientists of the time that argued against it just like warming deniers today.
 
Quote from Free Thinker:

[B do you have any concept of how science works?
[/B]
More...

Method A. Choose a poltically beneficial outcome and go with it?

Method B. Examine data for racism?
 
Quote from Free Thinker:

these are scientific articles. do you have any concept of how science works?
the flat earth was a religious concept that people would not let go of because the bible describes the earth as flat.. it was the scientists of the time that argued against it just like warming deniers today.
More...

I know exactly how science works. Jumping to conclusions is not science. It's speculation! The global warming cult is a religous concept and the "scientists" you speak of are religous zealots. A PHD behind their name does not make them any less of a zealot. There is no conclusive evidence that CO2 is the primary driver. None!
 
Quote from CaptainObvious:

So I guess you would have been a flat earther when the majority believed the earth to be flat. You would have cheered with the masses as Galileo was said to be a heretic when he claimed the earth was not the center of the universe. You would have owned many slaves because the majority thought it to be just fine to do so.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote from Free Thinker:

these are scientific articles. do you have any concept of how science works?
the flat earth was a religious concept that people would not let go of because the bible describes the earth as flat.. it was the scientists of the time that argued against it just like warming deniers today.
More...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/zinncol1.html

"The Indians, Columbus reported, "are so naive and so free with their possessions that no one who has not witnessed them would believe it. When you ask for something they have, they never say no. To the contrary, they offer to share with anyone...." He concluded his report by asking for a little help from their Majesties, and in return he would bring them from his next voyage "as much gold as they need ... and as many slaves as they ask." He was full of religious talk: "Thus the eternal God, our Lord, gives victory to those who follow His way over apparent impossibilities."

Because of Columbus's exaggerated report and promises, his second expedition was given seventeen ships and more than twelve hundred men. The aim was clear: slaves and gold. They went from island to island in the Caribbean, taking Indians as captives. But as word spread of the Europeans' intent they found more and more empty villages. On Haiti, they found that the sailors left behind at Fort Navidad had been killed in a battle with the Indians, after they had roamed the island in gangs looking for gold, taking women and children as slaves for sex and labor.

Now, from his base on Haiti, Columbus sent expedition after expedition into the interior. They found no gold fields, but had to fill up the ships returning to Spain with some kind of dividend. In the year 1495, they went on a great slave raid, rounded up fifteen hundred Arawak men, women, and children, put them in pens guarded by Spaniards and dogs, then picked the five hundred best specimens to load onto ships. Of those five hundred, two hundred died en route. The rest arrived alive in Spain and were put up for sale by the archdeacon of the town, who reported that, although the slaves were "naked as the day they were born," they showed "no more embarrassment than animals." Columbus later wrote: "Let us in the name of the Holy Trinity go on sending all the slaves that can be sold."
More...
 
Quote from CaptainObvious:

I know exactly how science works. Jumping to conclusions is not science. It's speculation! The global warming cult is a religious concept and the "scientists" you speak of are religious zealots. A PHD behind their name does not make them any less of a zealot. There is no conclusive evidence that CO2 is the primary driver. None!
More...

BINGO!
 
Quote from trendlover:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/zinncol1.html

"The Indians, Columbus reported, "are so naive and so free with their possessions that no one who has not witnessed them would believe it. When you ask for something they have, they never say no. To the contrary, they offer to share with anyone...." He concluded his report by asking for a little help from their Majesties, and in return he would bring them from his next voyage "as much gold as they need ... and as many slaves as they ask." He was full of religious talk: "Thus the eternal God, our Lord, gives victory to those who follow His way over apparent impossibilities."

Because of Columbus's exaggerated report and promises, his second expedition was given seventeen ships and more than twelve hundred men. The aim was clear: slaves and gold. They went from island to island in the Caribbean, taking Indians as captives. But as word spread of the Europeans' intent they found more and more empty villages. On Haiti, they found that the sailors left behind at Fort Navidad had been killed in a battle with the Indians, after they had roamed the island in gangs looking for gold, taking women and children as slaves for sex and labor.

Now, from his base on Haiti, Columbus sent expedition after expedition into the interior. They found no gold fields, but had to fill up the ships returning to Spain with some kind of dividend. In the year 1495, they went on a great slave raid, rounded up fifteen hundred Arawak men, women, and children, put them in pens guarded by Spaniards and dogs, then picked the five hundred best specimens to load onto ships. Of those five hundred, two hundred died en route. The rest arrived alive in Spain and were put up for sale by the archdeacon of the town, who reported that, although the slaves were "naked as the day they were born," they showed "no more embarrassment than animals." Columbus later wrote: "Let us in the name of the Holy Trinity go on sending all the slaves that can be sold."
More...
There were slaves in the 16th century, I'm shocked .
Absolutely SHOCKING :D :D :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top