She did not rule they had to stop doing it,she said they had to do it constitutionally.If there was an injunction it would have dropped to zero.
She did not rule they had to stop doing it,she said they had to do it constitutionally.If there was an injunction it would have dropped to zero.
She did not rule they had to stop doing it,she said they had to do it constitutionally.
The ruling means nothing without an injunction or other remedy. All we have from you so far is that she ordered a written policy.
You don't understand how these things work.
500,000 plus stops to 13,000.You're the one who doesn't seem to understand how these things work.
This language is not from a court decision.