Not as NYP applied it and IPatent suggested it.
Stop & frisk is always going to be used more in high crime neighborhoods, and police are always going to use their discretion as to who to question and stop. They should be using it in Chicago.
Not as NYP applied it and IPatent suggested it.
Eric Adams is bringing back a modified form of stop & frisk in NYC.
Key word is modified.It cant be 90% of black and brown people stopped and cops need more probable cause to make the stops.
When more non black and brown people keep getting stopped and searched for no reason they will throw a fit and Adams will stop it.I haven't even heard him mention it since he was elected.
Stop & frisk is always going to be used more in high crime neighborhoods, and police are always going to use their discretion as to who to question and stop. They should be using it in Chicago.
2 Federal Courts said otherwise
It's still stop & frisk, which is what I originally suggested. Chicago and other cities wouldn't need to be worried at all constitutionally. Of course, there should always be probable cause or its a waste of time.
2 Federal Courts said otherwise
Wrong, even in NY the appeals court reversed on other grounds and remained silent on the issue.
I said stop & frisk all races equally
And it should be noted that the NYC police department only changed their policies due to public pressure. There are still many other police departments across the U.S. still using stop & frisk. Which should properly be called -- Stop, question & frisk.